PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZECP vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZECP vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZECP achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.77% return.


ZECP

1D
0.08%
1M
0.13%
YTD
6.73%
6M
5.35%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
15.63%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.02%
YTD
3.77%
6M
3.59%
1Y
9.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZECP vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZECP and BUFX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZECP vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZECP
ZECP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZECP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZECP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZECP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ZECP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZECP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZECP vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF (ZECP) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZECPBUFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.37

ZECP vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZECP vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZECP drawdown since its inception was -21.86%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZECP and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZECPBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.86%

-2.87%

-18.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-2.87%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.65%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-0.25%

-5.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

Volatility

ZECP vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZECPBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

4.04%

+6.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.62%

4.04%

+10.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.62%

4.04%

+10.58%

ZECP vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZECP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZECP vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

ZECP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZECP
Zacks Earnings Consistent Portfolio ETF
0.74%0.79%0.63%0.73%0.91%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZECP and BUFX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, ZECP leads with 18.92% vs 9.40% for BUFX. On fees, ZECP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZECP has performed better with a 18.92% return vs 9.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZECP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

ZECP has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

ZECP is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Zacks and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ZECP and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZECP and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer