PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZDY.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by BMO, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. ZDY.TO is actively managed, while ZEB.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO returned 11.07%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZDY.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.

Performance

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDY.TO achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 19.22% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 11.07%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.82% annualized return.

ZDY.TO

1D
-0.12%
1M
9.13%
YTD
18.13%
6M
10.45%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*
11.07%

ZEB.TO

1D
-0.43%
1M
5.51%
YTD
19.22%
6M
24.72%
1Y
60.22%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
18.18%
10Y*
15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZDY.TO
BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)		18.13%4.45%26.22%4.58%1.64%22.92%-5.18%16.96%3.22%6.74%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		19.22%43.43%24.58%10.87%-10.38%39.38%3.52%16.06%-8.85%14.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDY.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2013

0.47

The correlation between ZDY.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ZDY.TO
ZEB.TO

Technology

29.0%

-

Healthcare

11.9%

-

Energy

9.8%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.5%

-

Financial Services

9.5%
100.0%

Communication Services

6.9%

-

Utilities

6.4%

-

Real Estate

5.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%

-

Industrials

4.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Technology

ZDY.TO
29.0%
ZEB.TO

-

Healthcare

ZDY.TO
11.9%
ZEB.TO

-

Energy

ZDY.TO
9.8%
ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

ZDY.TO
9.5%
ZEB.TO

-

Financial Services

ZDY.TO
9.5%
ZEB.TO
100.0%

Communication Services

ZDY.TO
6.9%
ZEB.TO

-

Utilities

ZDY.TO
6.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Real Estate

ZDY.TO
5.6%
ZEB.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

ZDY.TO
5.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Industrials

ZDY.TO
4.4%
ZEB.TO

-

Basic Materials

ZDY.TO
1.6%
ZEB.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)

BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Often compared with ZDY.TO:
ZDY.TO vs. VDY.TOZDY.TO vs. ZDV.TOZDY.TO vs. SCHDZDY.TO vs. ZLU.TOZDY.TO vs. VIGZDY.TO vs. ZGRO.TOZDY.TO vs. XEI.TO
Often compared with ZEB.TO:
ZEB.TO vs. ZWB.TOZEB.TO vs. VDY.TOZEB.TO vs. HBNK.TOZEB.TO vs. HCAL.TOZEB.TO vs. HMAX.TOZEB.TO vs. ZSP.TOZEB.TO vs. XIC.TO

Return for Risk

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ZDY.TO
ZDY.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ZDY.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDY.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO
ZEB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZEB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ZDY.TOZEB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.28
4.79

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.97
6.54

-3.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.90

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

7.17

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.78

30.84

-17.06

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDY.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is lower than the ZEB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 4.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDY.TO and ZEB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ZDY.TOZEB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

4.79

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

1.35

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.94

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.88

+0.07

Drawdowns

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDY.TO and ZEB.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ZDY.TOZEB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.01%

-39.69%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.78%

-8.44%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.32%

-14.80%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.32%

-25.97%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.01%

-39.69%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-2.00%

+1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.30%

-5.65%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

1.96%

0.00%

Volatility

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison

BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) have volatilities of 4.73% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ZDY.TOZEB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.89%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

11.14%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

12.62%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

13.52%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

16.91%

-1.73%

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZDY.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZDY.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison

ZDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.54% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZDY.TO
BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)		1.46%1.72%1.97%2.43%2.48%2.33%3.65%3.02%2.80%2.63%2.46%2.54%
ZEB.TO
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF		2.54%2.95%3.98%4.75%4.29%3.13%4.15%3.65%3.64%3.02%3.19%3.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

ZDY.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZDY.TO.

ZDY.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZDY.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZDY.TO and ZEB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer