ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO
ZDY.TO (BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD)) and VFV.TO (Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZDY.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by BMO, while VFV.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. ZDY.TO is actively managed, while VFV.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO returned 11.07%/yr vs 16.04%/yr for VFV.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZDY.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VFV.TO.
Performance
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZDY.TO achieves a 18.13% return, which is significantly higher than VFV.TO's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDY.TO has underperformed VFV.TO with an annualized return of 11.07%, while VFV.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.04% annualized return.
ZDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 18.13%
- 6M
- 10.45%
- 1Y
- 26.90%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
VFV.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 29.48%
- 3Y*
- 23.57%
- 5Y*
- 16.84%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 18.13% | 4.45% | 26.22% | 4.58% | 1.64% | 22.92% | -5.18% | 16.96% | 3.22% | 6.74% |
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 12.30% | 12.18% | 35.23% | 23.23% | -12.58% | 27.51% | 15.62% | 25.14% | 2.94% | 13.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZDY.TO and VFV.TO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2013 | 0.72 |
The correlation between ZDY.TO and VFV.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Technology
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Healthcare
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Energy
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Defensive
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Financial Services
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Communication Services
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Utilities
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Real Estate
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Consumer Cyclical
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Industrials
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Basic Materials
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ZDY.TO
VFV.TO
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZDY.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.48 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 3.44 | +0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 13.10 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZDY.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.59 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.14 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.97 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.01%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDY.TO and VFV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZDY.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.01% | -27.43% | -5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.78% | -8.62% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.32% | -19.05% | +3.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.32% | -22.19% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.01% | -27.43% | -5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.18% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.30% | -3.35% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 2.26% | -0.30% |
Volatility
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) (ZDY.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) at 3.05%. This indicates that ZDY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZDY.TO | VFV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 3.05% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | 8.55% | +1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.85% | 11.46% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.17% | 14.91% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.18% | 16.57% | -1.39% |
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZDY.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZDY.TO vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ZDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than VFV.TO's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFV.TO Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 0.83% | 0.92% | 0.99% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% |
ZDY.TO BMO US Dividend ETF (CAD) | 1.46% | 1.72% | 1.97% | 2.43% | 2.48% | 2.33% | 3.65% | 3.02% | 2.80% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZDY.TO and VFV.TO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VFV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VFV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZDY.TO.
ZDY.TO is categorized as Dividend, while VFV.TO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZDY.TO and 0.09% for VFV.TO.
Find the right allocation for ZDY.TO and VFV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer