ZD vs. ACM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and AECOM (ACM).

Performance

ZD vs. ACM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and AECOM (ACM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZD vs. ACM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc.	19.37%	-35.31%	-19.12%	-15.06%	-28.65%	50.14%	4.25%	36.49%	-5.54%	-6.48%
ACM AECOM	-10.75%	-9.91%	16.67%	9.77%	10.72%	55.38%	15.42%	62.75%	-28.67%	2.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ZD : $1.65B ACM : $11.19B
EPS ZD : $2.56 ACM : $4.17
PE Ratio ZD : 16.41 ACM : 20.34
PS Ratio ZD : 1.20 ACM : 0.71
PB Ratio ZD : 0.94 ACM : 5.02
Total Revenue (TTM) ZD : $1.45B ACM : $15.96B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZD : $837.62M ACM : $1.23B
EBITDA (TTM) ZD : $347.17M ACM : $1.19B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZD achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly higher than ACM's -10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ZD has underperformed ACM with an annualized return of -0.40%, while ACM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.09% annualized return.

ZD

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 54.95%
• YTD: 19.37%
• 6M: 10.13%
• 1Y: 11.66%
• 3Y*: -18.69%
• 5Y*: -14.43%
• 10Y*: -0.40%

ACM

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -13.43%
• YTD: -10.75%
• 6M: -34.66%
• 1Y: -7.60%
• 3Y*: 1.16%
• 5Y*: 6.50%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZD vs. ACM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZD

ZD Risk / Return Rank: 51
ZD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ZD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ZD Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ZD Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
ZD Martin Ratio Rank: 49

ACM

ACM Risk / Return Rank: 31
ACM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
ACM Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ACM Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ACM Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ACM Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZD vs. ACM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and AECOM (ACM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZD	ACM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	-0.25	+0.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.96	-0.13	+1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	0.98	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	-0.20	+0.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.69	-0.44	+1.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZD vs. ACM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZD Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is higher than the ACM Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZD and ACM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZD	ACM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	-0.25	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	0.25	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.01	0.36	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.22	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between ZD and ACM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZD vs. ACM - Dividend Comparison

ZD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	16.85%	0.00%	0.96%	2.42%	2.03%	1.66%	1.48%
ACM AECOM	1.29%	1.09%	0.82%	0.78%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZD vs. ACM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZD drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than ACM's maximum drawdown of -59.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZD and ACM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZD	ACM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.05%	-59.97%	-37.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.79%	-37.87%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-80.06%	-37.87%	-42.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.06%	-54.12%	-25.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.45%	-36.67%	-31.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.87%	-18.24%	-20.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.46%	16.90%	-2.44%

Volatility

ZD vs. ACM - Volatility Comparison

Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) has a higher volatility of 40.92% compared to AECOM (ACM) at 6.88%. This indicates that ZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZD	ACM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.92%	6.88%	+34.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	51.33%	25.64%	+25.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.97%	30.54%	+40.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.43%	25.85%	+18.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.71%	30.87%	+6.84%

Financials

ZD vs. ACM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ziff Davis, Inc. and AECOM over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 406.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ACM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AECOM reported a gross profit of 280.99M and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.

ZD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.05M and revenue of 406.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.

ACM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AECOM reported an operating income of 222.05M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

ZD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported a net income of 59.21M and revenue of 406.71M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.

ACM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, AECOM reported a net income of 159.26M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.