PortfoliosLab logo
ZD vs. UHS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZD and UHS is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ZD vs. UHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZD:

-0.93

UHS:

0.19

Sortino Ratio

ZD:

-1.41

UHS:

0.58

Omega Ratio

ZD:

0.83

UHS:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

ZD:

-0.54

UHS:

0.25

Martin Ratio

ZD:

-1.71

UHS:

0.49

Ulcer Index

ZD:

24.63%

UHS:

17.91%

Daily Std Dev

ZD:

44.53%

UHS:

34.73%

Max Drawdown

ZD:

-97.04%

UHS:

-60.27%

Current Drawdown

ZD:

-75.84%

UHS:

-20.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZD:

$1.35B

UHS:

$12.40B

EPS

ZD:

$1.73

UHS:

$17.61

PE Ratio

ZD:

18.40

UHS:

10.81

PEG Ratio

ZD:

0.84

UHS:

1.87

PS Ratio

ZD:

0.95

UHS:

0.77

PB Ratio

ZD:

0.74

UHS:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZD:

$1.42B

UHS:

$16.08B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZD:

$1.19B

UHS:

$9.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZD:

$306.41M

UHS:

$2.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZD achieves a -40.87% return, which is significantly lower than UHS's 6.60% return. Over the past 10 years, ZD has underperformed UHS with an annualized return of -4.81%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.27% annualized return.


ZD

YTD

-40.87%

1M

4.49%

6M

-44.33%

1Y

-41.22%

3Y*

-25.36%

5Y*

-13.94%

10Y*

-4.81%

UHS

YTD

6.60%

1M

11.15%

6M

-5.92%

1Y

6.43%

3Y*

15.83%

5Y*

13.15%

10Y*

4.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Ziff Davis, Inc.

Universal Health Services, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZD vs. UHS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZD is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZD is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZD is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZD is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZD is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZD is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

UHS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UHS is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UHS is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UHS is 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UHS is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UHS is 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UHS is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZD vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZD Sharpe Ratio is -0.93, which is lower than the UHS Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZD and UHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ZD vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison

ZD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ZD
Ziff Davis, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.10%2.79%2.33%1.91%1.70%2.03%
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
0.42%0.45%0.52%0.57%0.62%0.15%0.42%0.34%0.35%0.38%0.33%0.27%

Drawdowns

ZD vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZD drawdown since its inception was -97.04%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZD and UHS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ZD vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison

Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) at 10.40%. This indicates that ZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZD vs. UHS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ziff Davis, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
328.64M
4.10B
(ZD) Total Revenue
(UHS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZD vs. UHS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ziff Davis, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
85.6%
11.1%
(ZD) Gross Margin
(UHS) Gross Margin
ZD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 281.43M and revenue of 328.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.6%.

UHS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 454.83M and revenue of 4.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.1%.

ZD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.13M and revenue of 328.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.

UHS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 454.83M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

ZD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported a net income of 24.24M and revenue of 328.64M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.

UHS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 316.68M and revenue of 4.10B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.