ZD vs. UHS
Compare and contrast key facts about Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS).
Performance
ZD vs. UHS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ZD vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc. | 19.37% | -35.31% | -19.12% | -15.06% | -28.65% | 50.14% | 4.25% | 36.49% | -5.54% | -6.48% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | -18.30% | 22.02% | 18.19% | 8.83% | 9.37% | -5.16% | -4.00% | 23.62% | 3.16% | 6.93% |
Fundamentals
ZD:
$1.65B
UHS:
$11.47B
ZD:
$2.56
UHS:
$22.97
ZD:
16.41
UHS:
7.75
ZD:
1.20
UHS:
0.66
ZD:
0.94
UHS:
1.56
ZD:
$1.45B
UHS:
$17.36B
ZD:
$837.62M
UHS:
$11.64B
ZD:
$347.17M
UHS:
$2.72B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZD achieves a 19.37% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -18.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ZD has underperformed UHS with an annualized return of -0.40%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.00% annualized return.
ZD
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 49.80%
- YTD
- 19.37%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- 1Y
- 11.15%
- 3Y*
- -18.69%
- 5Y*
- -14.43%
- 10Y*
- -0.40%
UHS
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -13.80%
- YTD
- -18.30%
- 6M
- -12.41%
- 1Y
- -4.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZD vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank
ZD
UHS
ZD vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | -0.14 | +0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.96 | 0.03 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.00 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | -0.18 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.69 | -0.44 | +1.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | -0.14 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | 0.20 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | 0.12 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.46 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between ZD and UHS is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ZD vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison
ZD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UHS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZD Ziff Davis, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.85% | 0.00% | 0.96% | 2.42% | 2.03% | 1.66% | 1.48% |
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc. | 0.45% | 0.37% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.33% |
Drawdowns
ZD vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZD drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZD and UHS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.05% | -60.27% | -36.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.79% | -27.00% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.06% | -44.90% | -35.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.06% | -56.30% | -23.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.45% | -27.00% | -41.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.87% | -14.72% | -24.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.46% | 11.10% | +3.36% |
Volatility
ZD vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison
Ziff Davis, Inc. (ZD) has a higher volatility of 40.92% compared to Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) at 5.72%. This indicates that ZD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ZD | UHS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.92% | 5.72% | +35.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.33% | 22.97% | +28.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.97% | 34.15% | +36.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.43% | 31.25% | +13.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 34.11% | +3.60% |
Financials
ZD vs. UHS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ziff Davis, Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZD vs. UHS - Profitability Comparison
ZD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 406.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
UHS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ZD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.05M and revenue of 406.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.2%.
UHS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 517.23M and revenue of 4.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.
ZD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ziff Davis, Inc. reported a net income of 59.21M and revenue of 406.71M, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
UHS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Universal Health Services, Inc. reported a net income of 445.94M and revenue of 4.49B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.