PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCSH vs. SETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCSH vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZCSH having a 41.32% return and SETH slightly lower at 40.93%.


ZCSH

1D
-5.29%
1M
47.90%
YTD
41.32%
6M
72.54%
1Y
1,002.48%
3Y*
185.96%
5Y*
10Y*

SETH

1D
5.62%
1M
29.74%
YTD
40.93%
6M
46.51%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCSH vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
41.32%446.78%96.92%64.97%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
40.93%-29.41%-49.59%-22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCSH and SETH is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

-0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCSH vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCSH
ZCSH Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ZCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCSH vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZCSHSETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+6.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.05

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.55

-0.02

+14.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

28.49

-0.04

+28.53

ZCSH vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZCSH Sharpe Ratio is 6.10, which is higher than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZCSH and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCSHSETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.10

-0.02

+6.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

-0.45

+0.54

Drawdowns

ZCSH vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than SETH's maximum drawdown of -80.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and SETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCSHSETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.73%

-80.74%

-12.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-69.62%

-56.01%

-13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.71%

-61.29%

+45.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-74.41%

-54.79%

-19.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.49%

35.77%

-0.28%

Volatility

ZCSH vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a higher volatility of 48.45% compared to ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) at 9.81%. This indicates that ZCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCSHSETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

48.45%

9.81%

+38.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.06%

46.07%

+47.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

166.02%

68.54%

+97.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

136.87%

69.53%

+67.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

136.87%

69.53%

+67.34%

ZCSH vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCSH vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%.


PositionTTM202520242023
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.91%7.01%3.44%0.38%
ZCSH
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCSH and SETH have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZCSH has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to SETH (9.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZCSH dropped -93.73% vs SETH's -80.74%.

On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 1002.48% vs -1.33% for SETH. On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SETH has been the lower-risk option at 9.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 1002.48% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.

SETH has the higher dividend yield at 10.91%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.

ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while SETH tracks Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum (--100%). They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.95% for SETH.

ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCSH and SETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer