ZCSH vs. SBIT
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - ZCSH tracks the Zcash (ZEC) while SBIT tracks the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ZCSH returned 1002.48% vs 68.00% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SBIT.
Performance
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 41.32% return, which is significantly higher than SBIT's 37.02% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SBIT
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- 46.58%
- YTD
- 37.02%
- 6M
- 52.37%
- 1Y
- 68.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | 446.78% | -26.52% |
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 37.02% | -25.11% | -73.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and SBIT is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2024 | -0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
SBIT
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCSH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.18 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.55 | 1.43 | +13.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.49 | 2.76 | +25.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCSH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.10 | 0.78 | +5.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -0.46 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, roughly equal to the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and SBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -91.35% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | -47.94% | -21.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | -78.26% | +62.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | -68.55% | -5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.49% | 24.69% | +10.80% |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison
Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) has a higher volatility of 48.45% compared to Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) at 18.22%. This indicates that ZCSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | SBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.45% | 18.22% | +30.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.06% | 68.46% | +25.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 166.02% | 87.18% | +78.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 97.47% | +39.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 97.47% | +39.40% |
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SBIT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison
ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF | 3.42% | 0.52% | 1.00% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and SBIT have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZCSH has higher volatility (48.45%) compared to SBIT (18.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZCSH dropped -93.73% vs SBIT's -91.35%.
On 1-year performance, ZCSH leads with 1002.48% vs 68.00% for SBIT. On fees, SBIT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, SBIT has been the lower-risk option at 18.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZCSH has performed better with a 1002.48% return vs 68.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SBIT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
ZCSH tracks Zcash (ZEC), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.95% for SBIT.
ZCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.10 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and SBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer