ZCSH vs. CBOO
ZCSH (Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC)) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - ZCSH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Zcash (ZEC), while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. ZCSH is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCSH charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZCSH achieves a 41.32% return, which is significantly higher than CBOO's -0.04% return.
ZCSH
- 1D
- -5.29%
- 1M
- 47.90%
- YTD
- 41.32%
- 6M
- 72.54%
- 1Y
- 1,002.48%
- 3Y*
- 185.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 41.32% | 197.45% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.04% | -1.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCSH and CBOO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCSH vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
ZCSH
CBOO
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) (ZCSH) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZCSH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.55 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.49 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCSH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | -1.19 | +1.29 |
Drawdowns
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCSH drawdown since its inception was -93.73%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCSH and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCSH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.73% | -2.34% | -91.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.71% | -1.72% | -13.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.41% | -1.61% | -72.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.49% | — | — |
Volatility
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCSH | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 48.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.06% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 166.02% | 2.14% | +163.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 2.14% | +134.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 136.87% | 2.14% | +134.73% |
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCSH has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCSH vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
ZCSH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
ZCSH Grayscale Zcash Trust (ZEC) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCSH and CBOO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ZCSH.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for ZCSH.
ZCSH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ZCSH and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for ZCSH and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer