PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBG vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF (ZCBG) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBG

1D
-0.61%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBG and TLTX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.65

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2035 ETF (ZCBG) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBGTLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.67

-1.06

Drawdowns

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBG drawdown since its inception was -5.11%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBG and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBGTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-6.35%

+1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-3.69%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.99%

-2.28%

+0.29%

Volatility

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBGTLTXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33%

9.12%

-2.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.33%

9.12%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.33%

9.12%

-2.79%

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBG has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCBG vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

ZCBG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than TLTX's 15.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBG and TLTX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.74%, compared with 1.74% for ZCBG.

Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBG and 0.29% for TLTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBG and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer