PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBF vs. GGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBF

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GGOV

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
1.87%
6M
-1.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBF and GGOV is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and iShares Global Government Bond USD Hedged Active ETF (GGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBFGGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

-0.20

-0.23

Drawdowns

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBF drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, roughly equal to the maximum GGOV drawdown of -4.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBF and GGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBFGGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-4.69%

+0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.67%

-1.91%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-1.59%

-0.26%

Volatility

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBFGGOVDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.78%

5.37%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

5.37%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.78%

5.37%

+0.41%

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GGOV's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCBF vs. GGOV - Dividend Comparison

ZCBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while GGOV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBF and GGOV have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GGOV.

ZCBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for GGOV.

ZCBF is categorized as Government Bonds, while GGOV is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBF and 0.39% for GGOV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBF and GGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer