ZCBF vs. IBTE

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ZCBF (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBF tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2034 Maturity Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.

Performance

ZCBF vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZCBF

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: -1.29%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBTE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBF vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ZCBF Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF	-1.12%
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

ZCBF vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF (ZCBF) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZCBF	IBTE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	—	—

Drawdowns

ZCBF vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBF drawdown since its inception was -4.66%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBF and IBTE.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZCBF	IBTE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.66%	0.00%	-4.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	0.00%	-3.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.85%	0.00%	-1.85%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZCBF	IBTE	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.78%	0.00%	+5.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	0.00%	+5.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.78%	0.00%	+5.78%

ZCBF vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ZCBF and IBTE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZCBF vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison

ZCBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF	0.00%
ZCBF Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2034 ETF	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ZCBF or IBTE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZCBF or IBTE?

ZCBF and IBTE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZCBF or IBTE?

ZCBF has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.

What is the main difference between ZCBF and IBTE?

ZCBF tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2034 Maturity Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares.