PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBE vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBE

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VGLT

1D
-0.59%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
-0.75%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
-0.93%
5Y*
-5.37%
10Y*
-1.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBE and VGLT is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBE vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCBE

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBEVGLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.18

-0.60

Drawdowns

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBE drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBE and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBEVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-46.18%

+41.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

-37.05%

+33.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-15.07%

+13.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

Volatility

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBEVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.24%

8.77%

-3.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.24%

14.56%

-9.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

13.81%

-8.57%

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZCBE vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

ZCBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than VGLT's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.63%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%
ZCBE
Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF
1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, ZCBE and VGLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZCBE.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 1.66% for ZCBE.

ZCBE tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index, while VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBE and 0.03% for VGLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBE and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer