PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBE vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBE vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBE

1D
-0.56%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SHV

1D
0.03%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.74%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBE vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBE and SHV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBE vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZCBE

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBE vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBE vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBESHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

11.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

4.50

-4.92

Drawdowns

ZCBE vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBE drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBE and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBESHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-0.45%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.47%

0.00%

-3.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-0.03%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

Volatility

ZCBE vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBESHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.24%

0.20%

+5.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.24%

0.29%

+4.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.24%

0.28%

+4.96%

ZCBE vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ZCBE vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

ZCBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than SHV's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%
ZCBE
Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF
1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBE and SHV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHV.

SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 1.66% for ZCBE.

ZCBE tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index, while SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBE and 0.15% for SHV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBE and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer