ZCBE vs. GBIL

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ZCBE (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF) and GBIL (Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBE tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index while GBIL tracks the FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZCBE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GBIL.

Performance

ZCBE vs. GBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ZCBE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.45%
• 6M: 1.72%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: 4.64%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBE vs. GBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ZCBE Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF	-0.89%
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ZCBE and GBIL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026	0.21

Return for Risk

ZCBE vs. GBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBIL

GBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
GBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
GBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZCBE vs. GBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF (GBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZCBE	GBIL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	4.88	-5.29

Drawdowns

ZCBE vs. GBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBE drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, which is greater than GBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBE and GBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZCBE	GBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.24%	-0.76%	-3.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.76%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.47%	0.00%	-3.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-0.04%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ZCBE	GBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.04%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.24%	0.23%	+5.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.24%	0.58%	+4.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.24%	0.47%	+4.77%

ZCBE vs. GBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GBIL's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ZCBE vs. GBIL - Dividend Comparison

ZCBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than GBIL's 3.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GBIL Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF	3.74%	4.02%	4.93%	4.77%	1.37%	0.00%	0.81%	2.20%	1.70%	0.74%	0.11%
ZCBE Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZCBE and GBIL in my portfolio?

ZCBE and GBIL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ZCBE or GBIL?

On fees, ZCBE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZCBE or GBIL?

ZCBE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZCBE or GBIL?

GBIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 1.66% for ZCBE.

What is the main difference between ZCBE and GBIL?

ZCBE tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index, while GBIL tracks FTSE US Treasury 0-1 Year Composite Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBE and 0.12% for GBIL.