ZCBE vs. EDV
ZCBE (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF) and EDV (Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - ZCBE tracks the FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index while EDV tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCBE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for EDV.
Performance
ZCBE vs. EDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBE
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EDV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- 6M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 2.56%
- 3Y*
- -5.61%
- 5Y*
- -11.76%
- 10Y*
- -4.06%
ZCBE vs. EDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBE Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF | -0.62% |
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCBE and EDV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBE vs. EDV — Risk / Return Rank
ZCBE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EDV
ZCBE vs. EDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) and Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZCBE | EDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZCBE vs. EDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBE drawdown since its inception was -4.24%, smaller than the maximum EDV drawdown of -59.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBE and EDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBE | EDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -59.96% | +55.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.21% | -55.28% | +52.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -23.62% | +21.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility
ZCBE vs. EDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBE | EDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.20% | 14.06% | -8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 21.55% | -16.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 19.73% | -14.53% |
ZCBE vs. EDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCBE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than EDV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZCBE vs. EDV - Dividend Comparison
ZCBE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than EDV's 5.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDV Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF | 5.24% | 4.94% | 4.65% | 3.81% | 3.28% | 1.95% | 5.54% | 3.51% | 2.90% | 2.92% | 5.32% | 4.24% |
ZCBE Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF | 2.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCBE and EDV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EDV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EDV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for ZCBE.
EDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 2.01% for ZCBE.
ZCBE tracks FTSE Zero Coupon U.S. Treasury STRIPS 2033 Maturity Index, while EDV tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury STRIPS 20-30 Year Equal Par Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBE and 0.05% for EDV.
Find the right allocation for ZCBE and EDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer