PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZCBC vs. TLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF (ZCBC) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


ZCBC

1D
-0.51%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTX

1D
-0.23%
1M
-0.35%
YTD
0.01%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZCBC and TLTX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF (ZCBC) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZCBCTLTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

0.67

-1.09

Drawdowns

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZCBC drawdown since its inception was -3.65%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBC and TLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZCBCTLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.65%

-6.35%

+2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-3.69%

+0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-2.28%

+0.82%

Volatility

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZCBCTLTXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.59%

9.12%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.59%

9.12%

-4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.59%

9.12%

-4.53%

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZCBC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZCBC vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison

ZCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than TLTX's 15.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZCBC and TLTX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZCBC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZCBC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.

TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.74%, compared with 1.61% for ZCBC.

Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBC and 0.29% for TLTX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZCBC and TLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer