ZCBC vs. TLTX
ZCBC (Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF) and TLTX (Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF) are both Government Bonds funds from Global X. ZCBC is passively managed, while TLTX is actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZCBC charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TLTX.
Performance
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZCBC
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZCBC Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF | -0.79% |
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 0.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZCBC and TLTX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF (ZCBC) and Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF (TLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZCBC | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.42 | 0.67 | -1.09 |
Drawdowns
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZCBC drawdown since its inception was -3.65%, smaller than the maximum TLTX drawdown of -6.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZCBC and TLTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZCBC | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -6.35% | +2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -3.69% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.46% | -2.28% | +0.82% |
Volatility
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZCBC | TLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 9.12% | -4.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 9.12% | -4.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 9.12% | -4.53% |
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZCBC has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than TLTX's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZCBC vs. TLTX - Dividend Comparison
ZCBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than TLTX's 15.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TLTX Global X Treasury Bond Enhanced Income ETF | 15.74% | 7.54% |
ZCBC Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2032 ETF | 1.61% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZCBC and TLTX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZCBC is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZCBC is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for TLTX.
TLTX has the higher dividend yield at 15.74%, compared with 1.61% for ZCBC.
Their fees differ too: 0.07% for ZCBC and 0.29% for TLTX.
Find the right allocation for ZCBC and TLTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer