PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZBRA vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZBRA vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than SLV's 3.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ZBRA having a 15.95% annualized return and SLV not far behind at 15.63%.


ZBRA

1D
-1.53%
1M
7.48%
YTD
1.10%
6M
-6.68%
1Y
-15.65%
3Y*
-3.02%
5Y*
-13.83%
10Y*
15.95%

SLV

1D
1.16%
1M
1.62%
YTD
3.97%
6M
29.40%
1Y
113.72%
3Y*
45.73%
5Y*
21.04%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZBRA vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
1.10%-37.13%41.30%6.60%-56.92%54.87%50.46%60.42%53.40%21.04%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
3.97%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ZBRA and SLV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZBRA vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBRA
ZBRA Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ZBRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBRA Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBRA vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZBRASLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.36

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

2.69

-3.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.66

5.76

-6.42

ZBRA vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBRA and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZBRASLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.94

-2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.58

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

0.49

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.25

0.00

Drawdowns

ZBRA vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, roughly equal to the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZBRASLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.42%

-76.28%

+2.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.62%

-42.45%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.67%

-42.45%

-10.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.78%

-42.45%

-25.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.78%

-42.81%

-24.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.06%

-36.57%

-23.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-44.67%

+16.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.81%

19.81%

+4.00%

Volatility

ZBRA vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV) have volatilities of 15.85% and 16.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZBRASLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.85%

16.34%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.82%

58.31%

-28.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.13%

58.90%

-17.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.27%

36.15%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.26%

31.83%

+7.43%

Dividends

ZBRA vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

Neither ZBRA nor SLV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ZBRA and SLV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to ZBRA (15.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBRA dropped -73.42% vs SLV's -76.28%.

SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZBRA and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer