PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZBRA vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
-13.90%-37.13%41.30%6.60%-56.92%54.87%50.46%60.42%53.40%21.04%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
33.16%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZBRA:

$10.59B

AMAT:

$273.09B

EPS

ZBRA:

$8.15

AMAT:

$9.73

PE Ratio

ZBRA:

25.66

AMAT:

35.13

PS Ratio

ZBRA:

1.99

AMAT:

9.76

PB Ratio

ZBRA:

2.95

AMAT:

12.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZBRA:

$5.40B

AMAT:

$28.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZBRA:

$2.55B

AMAT:

$13.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZBRA:

$1.04B

AMAT:

$9.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a -13.90% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 33.16% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 11.86%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 33.40% annualized return.


ZBRA

1D
4.91%
1M
-6.64%
YTD
-13.90%
6M
-29.64%
1Y
-26.01%
3Y*
-13.04%
5Y*
-15.72%
10Y*
11.86%

AMAT

1D
5.78%
1M
-8.20%
YTD
33.16%
6M
67.47%
1Y
137.63%
3Y*
41.87%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
33.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZBRA vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBRA
ZBRA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZBRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZBRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZBRA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ZBRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZBRA Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZBRAAMATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.55

2.82

-3.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.52

3.05

-3.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.43

-0.50

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.61

6.44

-7.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

17.96

-19.20

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZBRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBRA and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZBRAAMATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

2.82

-3.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

0.47

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

0.79

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.41

-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between ZBRA and AMAT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.54%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%

Drawdowns

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and AMAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZBRAAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.42%

-85.22%

+11.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.62%

-21.37%

-20.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.78%

-55.14%

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-67.78%

-55.14%

-12.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.98%

-13.46%

-52.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.51%

-38.96%

+11.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.48%

7.67%

+12.81%

Volatility

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is 10.07%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that ZBRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZBRAAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.07%

17.09%

-7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.27%

34.94%

-3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.61%

49.10%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.67%

43.28%

-3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.34%

42.40%

-3.06%

Financials

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B202120222023202420252026
1.48B
7.01B
(ZBRA) Total Revenue
(AMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

44.0%45.0%46.0%47.0%48.0%49.0%202120222023202420252026
44.6%
49.0%
Portfolio components
ZBRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 658.00M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 7.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

ZBRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 222.00M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.1%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

ZBRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 70.00M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.