ZBRA vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZBRA or AMAT.
Correlation
The correlation between ZBRA and AMAT is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ZBRA:
-0.42
AMAT:
-0.50
ZBRA:
-0.35
AMAT:
-0.47
ZBRA:
0.95
AMAT:
0.94
ZBRA:
-0.25
AMAT:
-0.49
ZBRA:
-0.89
AMAT:
-0.85
ZBRA:
18.15%
AMAT:
28.48%
ZBRA:
38.06%
AMAT:
47.90%
ZBRA:
-73.42%
AMAT:
-85.22%
ZBRA:
-56.60%
AMAT:
-38.57%
Fundamentals
ZBRA:
$13.56B
AMAT:
$126.74B
ZBRA:
$10.56
AMAT:
$7.66
ZBRA:
25.26
AMAT:
20.31
ZBRA:
1.13
AMAT:
1.77
ZBRA:
2.65
AMAT:
4.57
ZBRA:
3.61
AMAT:
6.80
ZBRA:
$5.11B
AMAT:
$20.99B
ZBRA:
$2.47B
AMAT:
$10.04B
ZBRA:
$976.00M
AMAT:
$6.48B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a -30.94% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's -4.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 9.62%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.44% annualized return.
ZBRA
-30.94%
19.40%
-33.21%
-15.54%
2.55%
9.62%
AMAT
-4.10%
12.57%
-18.59%
-25.18%
24.80%
24.44%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZBRA vs. AMAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ZBRA
AMAT
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 1.03% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) have volatilities of 13.80% and 13.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
ZBRA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 645.00M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.50B and revenue of 7.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.
ZBRA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 195.00M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.
ZBRA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.