ZBRA vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZBRA or AMAT.
Correlation
The correlation between ZBRA and AMAT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ZBRA:
0.50
AMAT:
-0.50
ZBRA:
0.88
AMAT:
-0.46
ZBRA:
1.11
AMAT:
0.94
ZBRA:
0.25
AMAT:
-0.56
ZBRA:
2.06
AMAT:
-0.98
ZBRA:
6.92%
AMAT:
21.86%
ZBRA:
28.45%
AMAT:
42.58%
ZBRA:
-73.42%
AMAT:
-85.22%
ZBRA:
-48.73%
AMAT:
-37.60%
Fundamentals
ZBRA:
$16.41B
AMAT:
$127.26B
ZBRA:
$10.48
AMAT:
$7.65
ZBRA:
30.48
AMAT:
20.48
ZBRA:
1.13
AMAT:
1.91
ZBRA:
$4.98B
AMAT:
$27.64B
ZBRA:
$2.36B
AMAT:
$13.19B
ZBRA:
$959.00M
AMAT:
$8.49B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a -18.43% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's -2.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 13.26%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 22.20% annualized return.
ZBRA
-18.43%
-20.18%
-8.78%
8.77%
7.30%
13.26%
AMAT
-2.58%
-12.81%
-19.49%
-24.18%
22.51%
22.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZBRA vs. AMAT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ZBRA
AMAT
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 1.01% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is 11.72%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that ZBRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities