PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ZBRA vs. AMAT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
21.46%
-20.49%
ZBRA
AMAT

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a 45.32% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 18.50%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.66% annualized return.


ZBRA

YTD

45.32%

1M

7.91%

6M

21.46%

1Y

75.86%

5Y (annualized)

10.29%

10Y (annualized)

18.50%

AMAT

YTD

8.75%

1M

-4.60%

6M

-20.49%

1Y

17.23%

5Y (annualized)

25.82%

10Y (annualized)

23.66%

Fundamentals


ZBRAAMAT
Market Cap$19.83B$144.89B
EPS$7.34$8.61
PE Ratio52.3920.41
PEG Ratio0.811.69
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.65B$27.18B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.13B$12.90B
EBITDA (TTM)$735.00M$8.15B

Key characteristics


ZBRAAMAT
Sharpe Ratio2.330.42
Sortino Ratio3.300.84
Omega Ratio1.411.11
Calmar Ratio1.210.53
Martin Ratio15.231.18
Ulcer Index4.98%15.19%
Daily Std Dev32.52%42.30%
Max Drawdown-73.42%-85.22%
Current Drawdown-35.37%-31.12%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between ZBRA and AMAT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.330.42
The chart of Sortino ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.300.84
The chart of Omega ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.11
The chart of Calmar ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.210.53
The chart of Martin ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 15.23, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0015.231.18
ZBRA
AMAT

The current ZBRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBRA and AMAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.33
0.42
ZBRA
AMAT

Dividends

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.87%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%1.61%2.21%

Drawdowns

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-35.37%
-31.12%
ZBRA
AMAT

Volatility

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is 8.16%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that ZBRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.16%
12.90%
ZBRA
AMAT

Financials

ZBRA vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items