ZBRA vs. AMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZBRA or AMAT.
Performance
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a 45.32% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 8.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 18.50%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.66% annualized return.
ZBRA
45.32%
7.91%
21.46%
75.86%
10.29%
18.50%
AMAT
8.75%
-4.60%
-20.49%
17.23%
25.82%
23.66%
Fundamentals
ZBRA | AMAT | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $19.83B | $144.89B |
EPS | $7.34 | $8.61 |
PE Ratio | 52.39 | 20.41 |
PEG Ratio | 0.81 | 1.69 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $4.65B | $27.18B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.13B | $12.90B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $735.00M | $8.15B |
Key characteristics
ZBRA | AMAT | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 2.33 | 0.42 |
Sortino Ratio | 3.30 | 0.84 |
Omega Ratio | 1.41 | 1.11 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.21 | 0.53 |
Martin Ratio | 15.23 | 1.18 |
Ulcer Index | 4.98% | 15.19% |
Daily Std Dev | 32.52% | 42.30% |
Max Drawdown | -73.42% | -85.22% |
Current Drawdown | -35.37% | -31.12% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ZBRA and AMAT is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Zebra Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.87% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and AMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is 8.16%, while Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that ZBRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ZBRA vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities