ZBRA vs. CHAT
ZBRA (Zebra Technologies Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, ZBRA returned -3.57%/yr vs 55.51%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a 2.67% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 74.30% return.
ZBRA
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 11.43%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- -3.87%
- 1Y
- -14.62%
- 3Y*
- -3.57%
- 5Y*
- -13.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.37%
CHAT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 27.78%
- YTD
- 74.30%
- 6M
- 73.13%
- 1Y
- 144.01%
- 3Y*
- 55.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 2.67% | -37.13% | 41.30% | -2.15% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 74.30% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZBRA and CHAT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZBRA vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
ZBRA
CHAT
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.65 | -0.69 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 8.90 | -9.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 26.26 | -26.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.36 | 4.72 | -5.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.98 | -1.73 |
Drawdowns
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.42% | -31.34% | -42.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.62% | -16.28% | -25.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.67% | -31.34% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.43% | -0.66% | -58.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -5.35% | -22.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.75% | 5.51% | +18.24% |
Volatility
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) has a higher volatility of 15.81% compared to Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) at 11.70%. This indicates that ZBRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.81% | 11.70% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.79% | 24.62% | +5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.16% | 30.74% | +10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 29.90% | +10.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.27% | 29.90% | +9.37% |
Dividends
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.64% | 2.85% |
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZBRA and CHAT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZBRA has higher volatility (15.81%) compared to CHAT (11.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBRA dropped -73.42% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.72 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZBRA and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer