ZBRA vs. CHAT
ZBRA (Zebra Technologies Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Artificial Intelligence fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, ZBRA returned 4.87%/yr vs 40.54%/yr for CHAT. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a 21.00% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 39.01% return.
ZBRA
- 1D
- 1.82%
- 1M
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 25.04%
- YTD
- 21.00%
- 1Y
- -12.36%
- 3Y*
- 4.87%
- 5Y*
- -11.86%
- 10Y*
- 18.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.17%
CHAT
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.64%
- YTD
- 39.01%
- 1Y
- 68.87%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.20%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $58.63M | $57.19M | $67.40M | |
| $214.87M | $186.10M | $241.29M |
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 21.00% | -37.13% | 41.30% | 0.61% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 39.01% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZBRA and CHAT is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023 | 0.45 |
The correlation between ZBRA and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.46 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZBRA vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
ZBRA
CHAT
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 2.25 | -2.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 7.96 | -8.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.42% | -31.34% | -42.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.62% | -28.34% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.67% | -31.34% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.19% | -21.25% | -30.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -5.73% | -22.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.86% | 8.01% | +17.85% |
Volatility
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) is 10.84%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 16.74%. This indicates that ZBRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZBRA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.84% | 16.74% | -5.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.77% | 34.39% | -1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.95% | 39.18% | +4.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.89% | 32.41% | +8.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.39% | 32.41% | +6.98% |
Dividends
ZBRA vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 2.05% | 2.85% |
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZBRA and CHAT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (16.74%) compared to ZBRA (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZBRA dropped -73.42% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZBRA and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer