ZAPR vs. NVDO
ZAPR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZAPR achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
ZAPR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 3.25%
- 6M
- 3.73%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 3.25% | 2.02% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAPR and NVDO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZAPR vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
ZAPR
NVDO
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April (ZAPR) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.93 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 9.13 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.93 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 92.53 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.96 | 1.30 | +1.66 |
Drawdowns
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAPR drawdown since its inception was -1.72%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAPR and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.72% | -16.25% | +14.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | -2.68% | +2.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -4.99% | +4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZAPR | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46% | 31.93% | -30.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 31.93% | -29.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.51% | 31.93% | -29.42% |
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZAPR vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
ZAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
ZAPR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr April | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZAPR and NVDO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZAPR.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for ZAPR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ZAPR and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for ZAPR and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer