ZAP vs. PWR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).

ZAP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024.

Performance

ZAP vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZAP vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	10.67%	21.84%	1.26%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	30.11%	33.70%	-1.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAP achieves a 10.67% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 30.11% return.

ZAP

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: -3.57%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 9.86%
• 1Y: 33.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PWR

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 30.11%
• 6M: 32.55%
• 1Y: 116.24%
• 3Y*: 49.01%
• 5Y*: 44.09%
• 10Y*: 37.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZAP vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAP

ZAP Risk / Return Rank: 91
ZAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ZAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ZAP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ZAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ZAP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAP vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZAP	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.07	3.29	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	3.82	-1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.52	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.99	9.96	-5.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.91	24.49	-12.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZAP vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAP Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAP and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZAP	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.07	3.29	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.69	0.33	+1.35

Correlation

The correlation between ZAP and PWR is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZAP vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

ZAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than PWR's 0.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF	1.64%	1.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%

Drawdowns

ZAP vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAP drawdown since its inception was -12.38%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAP and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZAP	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.38%	-97.07%	+84.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	-11.66%	+3.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-5.09%	+1.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.67%	-47.15%	+44.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	4.74%	-1.86%

Volatility

ZAP vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP) is 5.40%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that ZAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZAP	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	11.17%	-5.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.77%	26.43%	-15.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	35.55%	-19.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	34.66%	-18.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	33.20%	-16.65%