ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zalando SE (ZAL.DE) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI).

Performance

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Zalando SE (ZAL.DE) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZAL.DE Zalando SE	-17.13%	-21.77%	51.00%	-35.22%	-53.46%	-21.88%	101.55%	101.34%	-49.13%	21.56%
^GDAXI DAX Performance Index	-5.40%	23.01%	18.85%	20.31%	-12.35%	15.79%	3.55%	25.48%	-18.26%	12.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZAL.DE achieves a -17.13% return, which is significantly lower than ^GDAXI's -5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ZAL.DE has underperformed ^GDAXI with an annualized return of -3.08%, while ^GDAXI has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.

ZAL.DE

• 1D: -1.13%
• 1M: 9.60%
• YTD: -17.13%
• 6M: -22.74%
• 1Y: -37.16%
• 3Y*: -18.02%
• 5Y*: -24.48%
• 10Y*: -3.08%

^GDAXI

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -2.62%
• YTD: -5.40%
• 6M: -5.14%
• 1Y: 3.47%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 8.93%
• 10Y*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZAL.DE

ZAL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
ZAL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
ZAL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
ZAL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9
ZAL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ZAL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 17

^GDAXI

^GDAXI Risk / Return Rank: 25
^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
^GDAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
^GDAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 21
^GDAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
^GDAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zalando SE (ZAL.DE) and DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZAL.DE	^GDAXI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.90	0.20	-1.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.22	0.38	-1.60
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.05	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	0.54	-1.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.18	1.91	-3.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAL.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the ^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAL.DE and ^GDAXI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZAL.DE	^GDAXI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.90	0.20	-1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.52	0.53	-1.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.07	0.49	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.00	0.41	-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between ZAL.DE and ^GDAXI is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Drawdowns

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAL.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.41%, which is greater than ^GDAXI's maximum drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAL.DE and ^GDAXI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZAL.DE	^GDAXI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.41%	-72.68%	-11.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.44%	-12.27%	-34.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.41%	-26.40%	-58.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-84.41%	-38.78%	-45.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.93%	-8.86%	-71.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.74%	-14.75%	-19.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.57%	3.50%	+26.07%

Volatility

ZAL.DE vs. ^GDAXI - Volatility Comparison

Zalando SE (ZAL.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) at 6.64%. This indicates that ZAL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GDAXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZAL.DE	^GDAXI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.55%	6.64%	+8.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.63%	11.28%	+20.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.45%	17.64%	+23.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.75%	16.80%	+29.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.95%	18.30%	+24.65%