PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GDAXI vs. ^AEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) and AEX Index (^AEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GDAXI
DAX Performance Index
-4.87%23.01%18.85%20.31%-12.35%15.79%3.55%25.48%-18.26%12.51%
^AEX
AEX Index
2.67%8.27%11.67%14.20%-13.65%27.75%3.31%23.92%-10.41%12.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GDAXI achieves a -4.87% return, which is significantly lower than ^AEX's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GDAXI has outperformed ^AEX with an annualized return of 9.05%, while ^AEX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.44% annualized return.


^GDAXI

1D
2.73%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
-4.87%
6M
-3.38%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
9.05%
10Y*
9.05%

^AEX

1D
1.76%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
2.67%
6M
3.01%
1Y
7.90%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GDAXI
^GDAXI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

^AEX
^AEX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
^AEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^AEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
^AEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
^AEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
^AEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) and AEX Index (^AEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^GDAXI^AEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

0.50

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

0.76

-0.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.11

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

2.36

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.12

5.66

-4.54

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the ^AEX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GDAXI and ^AEX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^GDAXI^AEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

0.50

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.36

+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between ^GDAXI and ^AEX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GDAXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, roughly equal to the maximum ^AEX drawdown of -71.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GDAXI and ^AEX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^GDAXI^AEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-71.60%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-11.65%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-23.80%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.78%

-35.78%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.35%

-5.18%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-22.69%

+7.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

2.84%

+0.78%

Volatility

^GDAXI vs. ^AEX - Volatility Comparison

DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to AEX Index (^AEX) at 5.17%. This indicates that ^GDAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^AEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^GDAXI^AEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

5.17%

+1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.31%

10.00%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.71%

15.47%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

15.39%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

16.22%

+2.08%