PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) and CAC 40 (^FCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^GDAXI
DAX Performance Index
-5.40%23.01%18.85%20.31%-12.35%15.79%3.55%25.48%-18.26%12.51%
^FCHI
CAC 40
-2.30%10.42%-2.15%16.52%-9.50%28.85%-7.14%26.37%-10.95%9.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^GDAXI achieves a -5.40% return, which is significantly lower than ^FCHI's -2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ^GDAXI has outperformed ^FCHI with an annualized return of 8.96%, while ^FCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.


^GDAXI

1D
-0.56%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-5.40%
6M
-5.14%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
14.14%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
8.96%

^FCHI

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.75%
YTD
-2.30%
6M
-1.17%
1Y
1.32%
3Y*
2.72%
5Y*
5.46%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^GDAXI
^GDAXI Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GDAXI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

^FCHI
^FCHI Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
^FCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^FCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
^FCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
^FCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
^FCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) and CAC 40 (^FCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


^GDAXI^FCHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.20

0.08

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.38

0.21

+0.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.03

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.35

-0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.91

4.63

-2.72

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^GDAXI Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the ^FCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^GDAXI and ^FCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


^GDAXI^FCHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.08

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.33

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.35

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.21

+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between ^GDAXI and ^FCHI is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^GDAXI drawdown since its inception was -72.68%, which is greater than ^FCHI's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^GDAXI and ^FCHI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


^GDAXI^FCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.68%

-65.29%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.27%

-11.08%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-23.04%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.78%

-38.56%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.86%

-7.64%

-1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.75%

-23.58%

+8.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.23%

+0.27%

Volatility

^GDAXI vs. ^FCHI - Volatility Comparison

DAX Performance Index (^GDAXI) has a higher volatility of 6.64% compared to CAC 40 (^FCHI) at 5.18%. This indicates that ^GDAXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^FCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


^GDAXI^FCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.64%

5.18%

+1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

9.46%

+1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

15.86%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

16.17%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.30%

17.66%

+0.64%