PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Z vs. ZG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

Z vs. ZG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with Z having a -47.95% return and ZG slightly higher at -47.84%. Over the past 10 years, Z has outperformed ZG with an annualized return of 1.93%, while ZG has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.


Z

1D
-2.36%
1M
-19.35%
YTD
-47.95%
6M
-53.28%
1Y
-48.62%
3Y*
-8.71%
5Y*
-20.06%
10Y*
1.93%

ZG

1D
-2.71%
1M
-19.61%
YTD
-47.84%
6M
-51.82%
1Y
-47.66%
3Y*
-8.04%
5Y*
-20.27%
10Y*
1.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Z vs. ZG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
Z
Zillow Group, Inc.
-47.95%-7.87%27.98%79.63%-49.55%-50.81%182.54%45.47%-22.83%12.20%
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc.
-47.84%-3.70%24.91%81.74%-49.84%-54.23%197.20%45.53%-22.85%11.77%

Correlation

The correlation between Z and ZG is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2015

0.98

The correlation between Z and ZG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

Z:

$8.51B

ZG:

$8.53B

EPS

Z:

$0.25

ZG:

$0.24

PE Ratio

Z:

143.98

ZG:

145.85

PEG Ratio

Z:

0.95

ZG:

0.96

PS Ratio

Z:

3.26

ZG:

3.30

PB Ratio

Z:

1.93

ZG:

1.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

Z:

$2.69B

ZG:

$2.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

Z:

$1.98B

ZG:

$1.98B

EBITDA (TTM)

Z:

$257.00M

ZG:

$263.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

Z vs. ZG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

Z
Z Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
Z Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Z Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
Z Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
Z Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
Z Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

ZG
ZG Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ZG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ZG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZG Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Z vs. ZG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZZGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.11

-1.10

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.66

-1.63

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

0.80

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.81

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.48

-1.52

+0.03

Z vs. ZG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current Z Sharpe Ratio is -1.11, which is comparable to the ZG Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of Z and ZG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZZGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.11

-1.10

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

-0.39

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

0.03

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.20

-0.16

Drawdowns

Z vs. ZG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum Z drawdown since its inception was -86.51%, roughly equal to the maximum ZG drawdown of -86.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for Z and ZG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZZGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.51%

-86.74%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.25%

-59.24%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.25%

-59.24%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.29%

-78.31%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.51%

-86.74%

+0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.24%

-82.54%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.42%

-38.29%

-6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.84%

31.49%

+1.35%

Volatility

Z vs. ZG - Volatility Comparison

Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) at 8.96%. This indicates that Z's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZZGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

8.96%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.68%

35.42%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.88%

43.31%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.05%

52.43%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.88%

53.04%

-0.16%

Dividends

Z vs. ZG - Dividend Comparison

Neither Z nor ZG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Z
Zillow Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZG
Zillow Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%223.86%

Financials

Z vs. ZG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zillow Group, Inc. and Zillow Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
708.00M
708.00M
(Z) Total Revenue
(ZG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Z vs. ZG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zillow Group, Inc. and Zillow Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
73.3%
73.3%
Portfolio components
Z - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 519.00M and revenue of 708.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.3%.

ZG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 519.00M and revenue of 708.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.3%.

Z - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.00M and revenue of 708.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

ZG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.00M and revenue of 708.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

Z - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a net income of 46.00M and revenue of 708.00M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

ZG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a net income of 46.00M and revenue of 708.00M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, Z and ZG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Z has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to ZG (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, Z dropped -86.51% vs ZG's -86.74%.

ZG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.10 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for Z and ZG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer