ZG vs. TMHC
ZG (Zillow Group, Inc.) and TMHC (Taylor Morrison Home Corporation) are both stocks. ZG operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while TMHC operates in Residential Construction (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ZG returned 1.81%/yr vs 16.89%/yr for TMHC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZG vs. TMHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZG achieves a -47.84% return, which is significantly lower than TMHC's 21.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ZG has underperformed TMHC with an annualized return of 1.81%, while TMHC has yielded a comparatively higher 16.89% annualized return.
ZG
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- -19.61%
- YTD
- -47.84%
- 6M
- -51.82%
- 1Y
- -47.66%
- 3Y*
- -8.04%
- 5Y*
- -20.27%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
TMHC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 22.12%
- YTD
- 21.52%
- 6M
- 10.79%
- 1Y
- 26.44%
- 3Y*
- 17.19%
- 5Y*
- 19.21%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
ZG vs. TMHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZG Zillow Group, Inc. | -47.84% | -3.70% | 24.91% | 81.74% | -49.84% | -54.23% | 197.20% | 45.53% | -22.85% | 11.77% |
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 21.52% | -3.82% | 14.73% | 75.78% | -13.19% | 36.30% | 17.34% | 37.48% | -35.02% | 27.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZG and TMHC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013 | 0.37 |
The correlation between ZG and TMHC shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.45 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZG:
$8.53B
TMHC:
$6.98B
ZG:
$0.24
TMHC:
$6.75
ZG:
145.85
TMHC:
10.60
ZG:
0.96
TMHC:
0.66
ZG:
3.30
TMHC:
0.94
ZG:
1.93
TMHC:
1.12
ZG:
$2.69B
TMHC:
$7.61B
ZG:
$1.98B
TMHC:
$1.71B
ZG:
$263.00M
TMHC:
$1.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZG vs. TMHC — Risk / Return Rank
ZG
TMHC
ZG vs. TMHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) and Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZG | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.17 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | 1.12 | -1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | 2.07 | -3.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZG | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | 0.67 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | 0.51 | -0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.38 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.21 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
ZG vs. TMHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZG drawdown since its inception was -86.74%, which is greater than TMHC's maximum drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZG and TMHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZG | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.74% | -75.18% | -11.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.24% | -23.80% | -35.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.24% | -27.90% | -31.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.31% | -40.84% | -37.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.74% | -75.18% | -11.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.54% | -4.36% | -78.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -20.30% | -17.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.49% | 12.79% | +18.70% |
Volatility
ZG vs. TMHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Zillow Group, Inc. (ZG) is 8.96%, while Taylor Morrison Home Corporation (TMHC) has a volatility of 21.66%. This indicates that ZG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZG | TMHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 21.66% | -12.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.42% | 29.96% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.31% | 39.38% | +3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.43% | 37.90% | +14.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.04% | 44.83% | +8.21% |
Dividends
ZG vs. TMHC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZG nor TMHC has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMHC Taylor Morrison Home Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZG Zillow Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 223.86% |
Financials
ZG vs. TMHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zillow Group, Inc. and Taylor Morrison Home Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZG vs. TMHC - Profitability Comparison
ZG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 519.00M and revenue of 708.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.3%.
TMHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a gross profit of 290.64M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
ZG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 36.00M and revenue of 708.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.
TMHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported an operating income of 141.79M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.2%.
ZG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zillow Group, Inc. reported a net income of 46.00M and revenue of 708.00M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
TMHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Taylor Morrison Home Corporation reported a net income of 100.43M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZG and TMHC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMHC has higher volatility (21.66%) compared to ZG (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZG dropped -86.74% vs TMHC's -75.18%.
TMHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.67 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZG and TMHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer