Z vs. RDFN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN).

Performance

Z vs. RDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Z vs. RDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
Z Zillow Group, Inc.	-39.34%	-7.87%	27.98%	79.63%	-49.55%	-50.81%	182.54%	45.47%	-22.83%	-9.51%
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	44.33%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) Z : $2.58B RDFN : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) Z : $1.92B RDFN : $364.02M
EBITDA (TTM) Z : $229.00M RDFN : -$129.82M

Returns By Period

Z

• 1D: 1.45%
• 1M: -7.26%
• YTD: -39.34%
• 6M: -46.29%
• 1Y: -39.64%
• 3Y*: -2.37%
• 5Y*: -20.87%
• 10Y*: 5.84%

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

Z vs. RDFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

Z

Z Risk / Return Rank: 10
Z Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
Z Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
Z Omega Ratio Rank: 10
Z Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
Z Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Z vs. RDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.89	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.17	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.72	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.68	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.89	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between Z and RDFN is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

Z vs. RDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither Z nor RDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.30%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.84%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.77%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.57%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.59%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.38%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.07%	—	—

Financials