Z vs. RDFN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

Z (Zillow Group, Inc.) and RDFN (Redfin Corporation) are both stocks. Z operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services), while RDFN operates in Real Estate - Services (Real Estate). A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

Z vs. RDFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Z

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -19.68%
• YTD: -46.69%
• 6M: -49.55%
• 1Y: -46.80%
• 3Y*: -7.98%
• 5Y*: -19.63%
• 10Y*: 2.17%

RDFN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Z vs. RDFN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
Z Zillow Group, Inc.	-46.69%	-7.87%	27.98%	79.63%	-49.55%	-50.81%	182.54%	45.47%	-22.83%	-9.51%
RDFN Redfin Corporation	0.00%	42.19%	-23.74%	143.40%	-88.96%	-44.06%	224.65%	46.81%	-54.02%	44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between Z and RDFN is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2017	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between Z and RDFN has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) Z : $2.69B RDFN : $1.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) Z : $1.98B RDFN : $364.02M
EBITDA (TTM) Z : $257.00M RDFN : -$129.82M

Return for Risk

Z vs. RDFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

Z

Z Risk / Return Rank: 7
Z Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
Z Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
Z Omega Ratio Rank: 6
Z Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
Z Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Z vs. RDFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zillow Group, Inc. (Z) and Redfin Corporation (RDFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.07	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.56	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.81%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.40%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.62%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	Z	RDFN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.88%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.05%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.88%	—	—

Dividends

Z vs. RDFN - Dividend Comparison

Neither Z nor RDFN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both Z and RDFN in my portfolio?

Z and RDFN have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.