PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YYYM vs. RMOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YYYM vs. RMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF (YYYM) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


YYYM

1D
-0.44%
1M
2.03%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RMOP

1D
0.02%
1M
1.17%
YTD
3.38%
6M
3.85%
1Y
10.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YYYM vs. RMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YYYM and RMOP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YYYM vs. RMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YYYM

RMOP
RMOP Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
RMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YYYM vs. RMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF (YYYM) and Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

YYYM vs. RMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YYYMRMOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.99

-0.95

Drawdowns

YYYM vs. RMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YYYM drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, smaller than the maximum RMOP drawdown of -6.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YYYM and RMOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YYYMRMOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-6.67%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

0.00%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

-1.52%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

Volatility

YYYM vs. RMOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YYYMRMOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

3.81%

+6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.78%

5.66%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.78%

5.66%

+5.12%

YYYM vs. RMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

YYYM has a 2.78% expense ratio, which is higher than RMOP's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

YYYM vs. RMOP - Dividend Comparison

YYYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than RMOP's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RMOP
Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF
5.20%5.15%1.27%
YYYM
Amplify Municipal CEF High Income ETF
1.21%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YYYM and RMOP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, RMOP is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RMOP is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 2.78% for YYYM.

RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 1.21% for YYYM.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 2.78% for YYYM and 0.55% for RMOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YYYM and RMOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer