YXI vs. GMF
YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) and GMF (SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YXI is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while GMF is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YXI returned -8.25%/yr vs 10.18%/yr for GMF. At a correlation of -0.84, they often move in opposite directions. YXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GMF.
Performance
YXI vs. GMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YXI achieves a 8.21% return, which is significantly lower than GMF's 13.63% return. Over the past 10 years, YXI has underperformed GMF with an annualized return of -8.25%, while GMF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.18% annualized return.
YXI
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 0.05%
- 3Y*
- -11.68%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- -8.25%
GMF
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 4.94%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 14.39%
- 1Y
- 32.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.18%
YXI vs. GMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 8.21% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 13.63% | 21.99% | 16.55% | 8.20% | -18.99% | -1.93% | 24.96% | 19.92% | -14.25% | 41.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between YXI and GMF is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2010 | -0.84 |
The correlation between YXI and GMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.85 (10 years) to -0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YXI vs. GMF — Risk / Return Rank
YXI
GMF
YXI vs. GMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YXI | GMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.36 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 2.58 | -2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | 9.56 | -9.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YXI | GMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 1.97 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | 0.29 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.30 | 0.53 | -0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | 0.30 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
YXI vs. GMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YXI drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than GMF's maximum drawdown of -67.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YXI and GMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YXI | GMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.15% | -67.18% | -13.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.21% | -12.62% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | -21.43% | -31.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.65% | -35.76% | -21.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | -40.18% | -24.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.90% | -1.30% | -76.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | -16.59% | -37.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 3.40% | +4.78% |
Volatility
YXI vs. GMF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) has a higher volatility of 7.21% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF (GMF) at 6.15%. This indicates that YXI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YXI | GMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 6.15% | +1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | 13.65% | +1.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | 16.50% | +3.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.40% | 18.53% | +12.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | 19.19% | +8.23% |
YXI vs. GMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than GMF's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
YXI vs. GMF - Dividend Comparison
YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than GMF's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMF SPDR S&P Emerging Asia Pacific ETF | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.92% | 2.75% | 2.54% | 2.71% | 1.32% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 3.76% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.84% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YXI and GMF have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YXI has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to GMF (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YXI dropped -81.15% vs GMF's -67.18%.
On 10-year performance, GMF leads with 10.18% vs -8.25% for YXI. On fees, GMF is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GMF has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GMF has performed better with a 10.18% return vs -8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GMF is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.31% for GMF.
YXI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while GMF is Asia Pacific Equities. YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while GMF tracks S&P Asia Pacific Emerging BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YXI and 0.49% for GMF.
GMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YXI and GMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer