YXI vs. AFTY
YXI (ProShares Short FTSE China 50) and AFTY (Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YXI is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while AFTY is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China A 50. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.64, they often move in opposite directions. YXI charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for AFTY.
Performance
YXI vs. AFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
YXI
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 0.05%
- 3Y*
- -11.68%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- -8.25%
AFTY
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YXI vs. AFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 8.21% | -22.87% | -25.36% | 12.40% | 4.78% | 13.94% | -17.95% | -14.35% | 9.63% | -28.43% |
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20.48% | -12.80% | -22.47% | -7.37% | 33.77% | 44.23% | -24.26% | 45.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between YXI and AFTY is -0.64, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2015 | -0.64 |
The correlation between YXI and AFTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.65 (10 years) to -0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YXI vs. AFTY — Risk / Return Rank
YXI
AFTY
YXI vs. AFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short FTSE China 50 (YXI) and Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF (AFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YXI | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YXI | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.30 | — | — |
Drawdowns
YXI vs. AFTY - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YXI | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.90% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.31% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | — | — |
Volatility
YXI vs. AFTY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YXI | AFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.97% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.40% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.42% | — | — |
YXI vs. AFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
YXI has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AFTY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
YXI vs. AFTY - Dividend Comparison
YXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, while AFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFTY Pacer CSOP FTSE China A50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.23% | 2.08% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 7.96% | 1.85% | 6.62% | 1.19% | 16.76% |
YXI ProShares Short FTSE China 50 | 2.84% | 3.60% | 4.35% | 2.66% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.01% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YXI and AFTY have a correlation of -0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFTY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFTY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for YXI.
YXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.00% for AFTY.
YXI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AFTY is China Equities. YXI tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-100%), while AFTY tracks FTSE China A 50. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for YXI and 0.70% for AFTY.
Find the right allocation for YXI and AFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer