PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YSPY vs. QTJL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YSPY vs. QTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YSPY achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than QTJL's 7.15% return.


YSPY

1D
0.10%
1M
4.66%
YTD
5.53%
6M
7.18%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTJL

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.20%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.91%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
19.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YSPY vs. QTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YSPY and QTJL is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2025

0.83

The correlation between YSPY and QTJL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YSPY vs. QTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YSPY
YSPY Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
YSPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YSPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
YSPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
YSPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
YSPY Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QTJL
QTJL Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YSPY vs. QTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YSPYQTJLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.08

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.09

16.23

-9.14

YSPY vs. QTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YSPY Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QTJL Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YSPY and QTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YSPYQTJLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

2.06

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.52

+0.04

Drawdowns

YSPY vs. QTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YSPY drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum QTJL drawdown of -33.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSPY and QTJL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YSPYQTJLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.74%

-33.40%

+14.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.60%

-6.68%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.01%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

-7.94%

+2.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

1.27%

+2.67%

Volatility

YSPY vs. QTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - July (QTJL) at 0.31%. This indicates that YSPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YSPYQTJLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

0.31%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.18%

7.61%

+6.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.10%

10.01%

+9.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

20.42%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.28%

20.42%

+0.86%

YSPY vs. QTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YSPY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than QTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

YSPY vs. QTJL - Dividend Comparison

YSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.98%, while QTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


YSPY and QTJL have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YSPY has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to QTJL (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YSPY dropped -18.74% vs QTJL's -33.40%.

On 1-year performance, YSPY leads with 27.85% vs 20.52% for QTJL. On fees, QTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTJL has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YSPY has performed better with a 27.85% return vs 20.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YSPY.

YSPY has the higher dividend yield at 56.98%, compared with 0.00% for QTJL.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YSPY and 0.79% for QTJL.

QTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YSPY and QTJL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer