YSPY vs. COTG
YSPY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. YSPY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.
Performance
YSPY vs. COTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YSPY achieves a 5.53% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 17.32% return.
YSPY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- YTD
- 5.53%
- 6M
- 7.18%
- 1Y
- 27.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- YTD
- 17.32%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YSPY vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YSPY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF | 5.53% | 3.19% |
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 17.32% | -21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between YSPY and COTG is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YSPY vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank
YSPY
COTG
YSPY vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF (YSPY) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YSPY | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YSPY | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | -0.28 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
YSPY vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YSPY drawdown since its inception was -18.74%, smaller than the maximum COTG drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YSPY and COTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YSPY | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -25.69% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.43% | -23.48% | +23.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -8.35% | +3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.94% | — | — |
Volatility
YSPY vs. COTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YSPY | COTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.10% | 40.65% | -21.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 40.65% | -19.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 40.65% | -19.37% |
YSPY vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
YSPY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
YSPY vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison
YSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 56.98%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YSPY GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF | 56.98% | 45.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YSPY and COTG have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for YSPY.
YSPY has the higher dividend yield at 56.98%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for YSPY and 0.75% for COTG.
Find the right allocation for YSPY and COTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer