PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YQQQ vs. GQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YQQQ achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly lower than GQQQ's 16.19% return.


YQQQ

1D
-0.25%
1M
3.85%
6M
-3.32%
YTD
-2.27%
1Y
-5.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-8.84%

GQQQ

1D
0.73%
1M
-1.32%
6M
13.08%
YTD
16.19%
1Y
28.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$400.11K$656.11K$581.68K
$672.47K$456.85K$596.52K

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YQQQ
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
-2.27%-9.97%-1.18%
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
16.19%17.37%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between YQQQ and GQQQ is -0.94, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

-0.93

The correlation between YQQQ and GQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.94 to -0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YQQQ vs. GQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YQQQ
YQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
YQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
YQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
YQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

GQQQ
GQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
GQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) and Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YQQQGQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.25

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

2.40

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.44

9.16

-9.60

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YQQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the GQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YQQQ and GQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YQQQ drawdown since its inception was -29.10%, which is greater than GQQQ's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YQQQ and GQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YQQQGQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.10%

-22.36%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.80%

-11.02%

-10.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.91%

-4.80%

-18.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.15%

-3.14%

-12.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.05%

2.88%

+7.17%

Volatility

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF (YQQQ) is 4.48%, while Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF (GQQQ) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that YQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YQQQGQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

5.96%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.99%

15.28%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

18.34%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.54%

20.73%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.54%

20.73%

-4.19%

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YQQQ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GQQQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

YQQQ vs. GQQQ - Dividend Comparison

YQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.92%, more than GQQQ's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GQQQ
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
0.47%0.46%0.11%
YQQQ
YieldMax Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
28.92%31.71%7.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


YQQQ and GQQQ have a correlation of -0.94, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GQQQ has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to YQQQ (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YQQQ dropped -29.10% vs GQQQ's -22.36%.

On 1-year performance, GQQQ leads with 28.41% vs -5.69% for YQQQ. On fees, GQQQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, YQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GQQQ has performed better with a 28.41% return vs -5.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GQQQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YQQQ.

YQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 28.92%, compared with 0.47% for GQQQ.

YQQQ is categorized as Derivative Income, while GQQQ is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YQQQ and 0.35% for GQQQ.

GQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YQQQ and GQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer