PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YOLO vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YOLO vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -6.36% return, which is significantly lower than SHV's 1.42% return.


YOLO

1D
-0.64%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
6.55%
1Y
60.94%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
-30.84%
10Y*

SHV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.42%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.92%
3Y*
4.64%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YOLO vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
-6.36%36.36%-17.81%-15.10%-72.21%-20.48%47.17%-50.02%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.42%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.10%0.81%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between YOLO and SHV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

-0.04

The correlation between YOLO and SHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.00 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YOLO vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YOLO
YOLO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
YOLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YOLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
YOLO Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
YOLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
YOLO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YOLO vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YOLOSHVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

19.64

-18.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

150.25

-148.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

54.02

-52.80

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.42

433.49

-432.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.69

2,436.45

-2,433.76

YOLO vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YOLO Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 19.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YOLO and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YOLOSHVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

19.64

-18.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

11.57

-12.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

8.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

4.50

-4.96

Drawdowns

YOLO vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YOLOSHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.68%

-0.45%

-94.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.09%

-0.01%

-41.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.45%

-0.03%

-66.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.47%

-0.40%

-92.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.05%

0.00%

-89.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.93%

-0.03%

-68.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.75%

0.00%

+21.75%

Volatility

YOLO vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a higher volatility of 11.95% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that YOLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YOLOSHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.95%

0.05%

+11.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.24%

0.12%

+52.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.34%

0.20%

+74.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.58%

0.29%

+53.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.33%

0.28%

+51.05%

YOLO vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

YOLO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

YOLO vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%
YOLO
AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%3.57%1.17%0.55%3.93%2.03%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YOLO and SHV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YOLO has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YOLO dropped -94.68% vs SHV's -0.45%.

On 5-year performance, SHV leads with 3.32% vs -30.84% for YOLO. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHV has performed better with a 3.32% return vs -30.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for YOLO.

SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.

YOLO is categorized as Cannabis, while SHV is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YOLO and 0.15% for SHV.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.64 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YOLO and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer