YNOT vs. CRTC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YNOT (Horizon Digital Frontier ETF) and CRTC (Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. YNOT is actively managed, while CRTC is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. YNOT charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for CRTC.

Performance

YNOT vs. CRTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YNOT achieves a 21.63% return, which is significantly higher than CRTC's 8.59% return.

YNOT

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: 8.38%
• YTD: 21.63%
• 6M: 20.04%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRTC

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 8.59%
• 6M: 8.79%
• 1Y: 23.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YNOT vs. CRTC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
YNOT Horizon Digital Frontier ETF	21.63%	11.82%
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	8.59%	7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between YNOT and CRTC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2025	0.87

YNOT vs. CRTC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	YNOT	CRTC
Technology	47.3%	33.5%
Industrials	17.2%	14.1%
Communication Services	13.4%	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.9%	6.3%
Basic Materials	8.4%	2.6%
Financial Services	1.9%	0.2%
Utilities	1.4%	6.0%
Healthcare	0.8%	14.1%
Energy	0.7%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	0.1%

Return for Risk

YNOT vs. CRTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRTC

CRTC Risk / Return Rank: 55
CRTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
CRTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
CRTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CRTC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YNOT vs. CRTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Digital Frontier ETF (YNOT) and Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF (CRTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YNOT	CRTC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.77	1.36	+0.41

Drawdowns

YNOT vs. CRTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YNOT drawdown since its inception was -16.73%, smaller than the maximum CRTC drawdown of -19.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YNOT and CRTC.

Drawdown Indicators

	YNOT	CRTC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.73%	-19.07%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-9.05%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.88%	-1.27%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.74%	-2.13%	-1.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	YNOT	CRTC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.20%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.64%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.11%	12.76%	+10.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.11%	15.73%	+7.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.11%	15.73%	+7.38%

YNOT vs. CRTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

YNOT has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CRTC's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

YNOT vs. CRTC - Dividend Comparison

YNOT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CRTC Xtrackers US National Critical Technologies ETF	1.00%	1.03%	1.13%	0.16%
YNOT Horizon Digital Frontier ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YNOT and CRTC in my portfolio?

YNOT and CRTC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, YNOT or CRTC?

On fees, CRTC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, YNOT or CRTC?

CRTC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for YNOT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YNOT or CRTC?

CRTC has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for YNOT.

What is the main difference between YNOT and CRTC?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for YNOT and 0.35% for CRTC.