YMAX vs. BAMU

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

YMAX (YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs) and BAMU (Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YMAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while BAMU is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Brookstone. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, YMAX returned -5.35% vs 2.87% for BAMU. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. YMAX charges 1.28%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMU.

Performance

YMAX vs. BAMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAX achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than BAMU's 1.36% return.

YMAX

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: -0.72%
• 6M: -1.86%
• YTD: 0.58%
• 1Y: -5.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BAMU

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 1.24%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 1Y: 2.87%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAX vs. BAMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs	0.58%	6.04%	26.90%
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	1.36%	3.21%	3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAX and BAMU is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2024	-0.01

The correlation between YMAX and BAMU shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

YMAX vs. BAMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAX

YMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7
YMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
YMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

BAMU

BAMU Risk / Return Rank: 99
BAMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
BAMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BAMU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAX vs. BAMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) and Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YMAX	BAMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.22	4.96	-5.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	8.74	-8.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	2.43	-1.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	24.38	-24.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	96.85	-97.31

YMAX vs. BAMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAX Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the BAMU Sharpe Ratio of 4.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAX and BAMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YMAX vs. BAMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAX drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than BAMU's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAX and BAMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	YMAX	BAMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.13%	-0.36%	-25.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.13%	-0.12%	-26.01%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.83%	0.00%	-10.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.47%	-0.02%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.47%	0.03%	+11.44%

Volatility

YMAX vs. BAMU - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAX) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) at 0.07%. This indicates that YMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YMAX	BAMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.63%	0.07%	+6.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.12%	0.36%	+19.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.94%	0.58%	+23.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.56%	0.86%	+22.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.56%	0.86%	+22.70%

YMAX vs. BAMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAX has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BAMU's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

YMAX vs. BAMU - Dividend Comparison

YMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 74.89%, more than BAMU's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAMU Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF	3.05%	3.20%	3.97%	0.84%
YMAX YieldMax Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs	74.89%	78.70%	44.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YMAX and BAMU in my portfolio?

YMAX and BAMU have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YMAX or BAMU?

YMAX has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to BAMU (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAX dropped -26.13% vs BAMU's -0.36%.

Which ETF is better, YMAX or BAMU?

On 1-year performance, BAMU leads with 2.87% vs -5.35% for YMAX. On fees, BAMU is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, BAMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YMAX or BAMU?

Over the 1-year period, BAMU has performed better with a 2.87% return vs -5.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YMAX or BAMU?

BAMU is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YMAX or BAMU?

YMAX has the higher dividend yield at 74.89%, compared with 3.05% for BAMU.

What is the main difference between YMAX and BAMU?

YMAX is categorized as Derivative Income, while BAMU is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAX and 1.09% for BAMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.96 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.