PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAG vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 14.65% return.


YMAG

1D
0.33%
1M
-3.35%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.65%
1Y
24.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
14.65%
6M
14.20%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAG vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and QQQY is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.82

The correlation between YMAG and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAG vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMAGQQQYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.40

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.76

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.87

11.59

-5.72

YMAG vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMAGQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

2.12

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

1.11

0.00

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAGQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-19.05%

-6.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-11.14%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.05%

-4.06%

-0.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-2.91%

-1.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

2.65%

+1.46%

Volatility

YMAG vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) is 4.87%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.53%. This indicates that YMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAGQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.87%

6.53%

-1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.03%

12.41%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

14.55%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.95%

15.03%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.95%

15.03%

+5.92%

YMAG vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAG vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.73%, more than QQQY's 35.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
35.66%45.34%83.34%20.64%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
51.73%52.27%35.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAG and QQQY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQY has higher volatility (6.53%) compared to YMAG (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 30.60% vs 24.05% for YMAG. On fees, QQQY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 4.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 30.60% return vs 24.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 51.73%, compared with 35.66% for QQQY.

YMAG is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.99% for QQQY.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAG and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer