YMAG vs. AFOS
YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. YMAG charges 1.28%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
YMAG vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than AFOS's 32.04% return.
YMAG
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 3.80%
- 6M
- 4.38%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 8.94%
- YTD
- 32.04%
- 6M
- 37.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 3.80% | 18.44% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 32.04% | 36.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between YMAG and AFOS is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YMAG vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
YMAG
AFOS
YMAG vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YMAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YMAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 4.35 | -3.16 |
Drawdowns
YMAG vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and AFOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YMAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -11.52% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -0.29% | -2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -1.37% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | — | — |
Volatility
YMAG vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YMAG | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.67% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 20.19% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.19% | +0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 20.19% | +0.69% |
YMAG vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
YMAG vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.16%, more than AFOS's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.22% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 52.16% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YMAG and AFOS have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 52.16%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for YMAG and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer