YLDE vs. FLTW
YLDE (ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YLDE is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. YLDE is actively managed, while FLTW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, YLDE returned 9.71%/yr vs 21.59%/yr for FLTW. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YLDE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.
Performance
YLDE vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YLDE achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 71.40% return.
YLDE
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 4.88%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTW
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 16.51%
- YTD
- 71.40%
- 6M
- 77.35%
- 1Y
- 117.33%
- 3Y*
- 42.83%
- 5Y*
- 21.59%
- 10Y*
- —
YLDE vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YLDE ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF | 4.88% | 13.09% | 16.44% | 15.69% | -8.56% | 22.12% | 10.35% | 32.46% | -5.74% | 4.42% |
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 71.40% | 32.00% | 16.68% | 30.05% | -27.51% | 29.46% | 29.77% | 31.23% | -9.32% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between YLDE and FLTW is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.43 |
The correlation between YLDE and FLTW shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YLDE vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank
YLDE
FLTW
YLDE vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YLDE | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.70 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 10.85 | -8.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.32 | 34.18 | -26.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YLDE | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 4.54 | -2.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.97 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.95 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
YLDE vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YLDE drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, smaller than the maximum FLTW drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLDE and FLTW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YLDE | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.23% | -38.00% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.59% | -10.87% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.42% | -26.45% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.22% | -38.00% | +17.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -1.18% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.55% | -8.43% | +4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 3.45% | -1.41% |
Volatility
YLDE vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) is 1.90%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 11.76%. This indicates that YLDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YLDE | FLTW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.90% | 11.76% | -9.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.78% | 21.34% | -14.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.33% | 26.03% | -16.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.50% | 22.44% | -8.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 21.77% | -6.01% |
YLDE vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison
YLDE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
YLDE vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison
YLDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.98%, more than FLTW's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF | 1.46% | 2.51% | 1.89% | 2.85% | 3.16% | 2.31% | 2.14% | 3.00% | 1.06% | 0.00% |
YLDE ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF | 6.98% | 5.68% | 1.69% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.15% | 1.46% | 1.65% | 2.25% | 1.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YLDE and FLTW have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLTW has higher volatility (11.76%) compared to YLDE (1.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLDE dropped -33.23% vs FLTW's -38.00%.
On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 21.59% vs 9.71% for YLDE. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, YLDE has been the lower-risk option at 1.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for YLDE.
YLDE has the higher dividend yield at 6.98%, compared with 1.46% for FLTW.
YLDE is categorized as Dividend, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for YLDE and 0.19% for FLTW.
FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YLDE and FLTW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer