PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLD vs. SCYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLD vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than SCYB's 1.84% return.


YLD

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.37%
YTD
2.78%
6M
2.86%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
8.90%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
5.71%

SCYB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.42%
YTD
1.84%
6M
1.96%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YLD vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
2.78%6.55%9.19%7.23%
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
1.84%8.33%8.15%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between YLD and SCYB is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023

0.69

The correlation between YLD and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLD vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SCYB
SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YLD vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YLDSCYBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

2.62

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.10

11.63

-0.53

YLD vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the SCYB Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLD and SCYB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YLD vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and SCYB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDSCYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-4.92%

-23.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-2.44%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.23%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-0.51%

-2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

0.55%

+0.03%

Volatility

YLD vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison

Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) at 1.01%. This indicates that YLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDSCYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

1.01%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.49%

3.01%

+0.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

3.79%

+0.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

5.11%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

5.11%

+3.09%

YLD vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLD vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, more than SCYB's 6.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
6.92%6.99%7.06%3.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
7.28%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLD and SCYB have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YLD has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to SCYB (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs SCYB's -4.92%.

On 1-year performance, YLD leads with 6.38% vs 6.36% for SCYB. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCYB has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YLD has performed better with a 6.38% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for YLD.

YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.28%, compared with 6.92% for SCYB.

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 0.03% for SCYB.

SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLD and SCYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer