PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLD vs. CVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLD vs. CVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLD achieves a 3.11% return, which is significantly lower than CVY's 10.45% return. Over the past 10 years, YLD has underperformed CVY with an annualized return of 5.85%, while CVY has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


YLD

1D
0.48%
1M
1.27%
YTD
3.11%
6M
3.78%
1Y
7.53%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
5.85%

CVY

1D
0.94%
1M
3.26%
YTD
10.45%
6M
9.84%
1Y
18.64%
3Y*
15.39%
5Y*
7.49%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YLD vs. CVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
3.11%6.55%9.19%12.93%-8.78%9.17%1.50%13.58%-3.30%9.12%
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.45%11.00%10.28%17.87%-9.27%25.31%-10.56%25.97%-10.77%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between YLD and CVY is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.47

The correlation between YLD and CVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLD vs. CVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YLD
YLD Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
YLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLD Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
YLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLD Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CVY
CVY Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVY Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVY Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YLD vs. CVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) and Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YLDCVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

2.46

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.68

8.22

+4.46

YLD vs. CVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the CVY Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLD and CVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YLD vs. CVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLD drawdown since its inception was -28.34%, smaller than the maximum CVY drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLD and CVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDCVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.34%

-66.86%

+38.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-7.43%

+5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.62%

-16.79%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.89%

-21.58%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.34%

-50.47%

+22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.70%

-10.40%

+7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

2.21%

-1.63%

Volatility

YLD vs. CVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Active High Yield ETF (YLD) is 1.34%, while Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF (CVY) has a volatility of 3.13%. This indicates that YLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDCVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

3.13%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.50%

7.89%

-4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.36%

11.04%

-6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.39%

16.22%

-9.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

19.55%

-11.35%

YLD vs. CVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CVY's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLD vs. CVY - Dividend Comparison

YLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.25%, more than CVY's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVY
Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF
3.65%3.99%4.07%4.41%5.18%2.37%3.40%3.22%4.44%3.94%4.50%5.89%
YLD
Principal Active High Yield ETF
7.25%7.33%7.12%6.46%6.51%3.92%4.40%4.81%5.42%6.28%4.47%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLD and CVY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CVY has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to YLD (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLD dropped -28.34% vs CVY's -66.86%.

On 10-year performance, CVY leads with 8.96% vs 5.85% for YLD. On fees, YLD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, YLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CVY has performed better with a 8.96% return vs 5.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YLD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.21% for CVY.

YLD has the higher dividend yield at 7.25%, compared with 3.65% for CVY.

YLD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CVY is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: Principal and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for YLD and 1.21% for CVY.

YLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLD and CVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer