YJUN vs. NVDO
YJUN (FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. YJUN is passively managed, while NVDO is actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
YJUN vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YJUN achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 20.98% return.
YJUN
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- 1Y
- 9.66%
- 3Y*
- 10.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 17.25%
- YTD
- 20.98%
- 6M
- 29.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YJUN vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June | 4.84% | 3.61% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 20.98% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between YJUN and NVDO is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YJUN vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
YJUN
NVDO
YJUN vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| YJUN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| YJUN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.39 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
YJUN vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YJUN drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, which is greater than NVDO's maximum drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YJUN and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YJUN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.53% | -16.25% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.75% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.93% | +0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.79% | -4.97% | +1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | — | — |
Volatility
YJUN vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YJUN | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.60% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 31.91% | -25.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.03% | 31.91% | -20.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.03% | 31.91% | -20.88% |
YJUN vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
YJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
YJUN vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
YJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.77%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 13.77% | 16.66% |
YJUN FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YJUN and NVDO have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for YJUN.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 13.77%, compared with 0.00% for YJUN.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YJUN and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for YJUN and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer