PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YJUN vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YJUN vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YJUN achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.


YJUN

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.86%
6M
3.95%
YTD
5.92%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.02%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$292.01K$537.36K$814.32K

YJUN vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
YJUN
FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June
5.92%18.77%1.65%14.81%-8.13%-0.06%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between YJUN and BNO is -0.29, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021

0.10

The correlation between YJUN and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YJUN vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YJUN
YJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
YJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
YJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
YJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
YJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YJUN vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YJUNBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

1.70

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.48

5.15

+7.33

YJUN vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YJUN and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YJUN vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YJUN drawdown since its inception was -21.53%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YJUN and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YJUNBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.53%

-87.06%

+65.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.16%

-34.46%

+30.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-34.46%

+25.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-34.46%

+12.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-16.21%

+15.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-39.99%

+36.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

11.86%

-10.89%

Volatility

YJUN vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF – June (YJUN) is 2.36%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that YJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YJUNBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.36%

17.47%

-15.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

40.96%

-35.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.25%

44.54%

-38.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.98%

36.41%

-25.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.92%

36.98%

-26.06%

YJUN vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

YJUN vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

Neither YJUN nor BNO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


YJUN and BNO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to YJUN (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YJUN dropped -21.53% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 5-year performance, BNO leads with 20.89% vs 6.18% for YJUN. On fees, YJUN is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, YJUN has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BNO has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YJUN is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

YJUN and BNO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

YJUN is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BNO is Oil & Gas. YJUN tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for YJUN and 1.00% for BNO.

YJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YJUN and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer