PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YINN vs. UTSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YINN vs. UTSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -29.95% return, which is significantly lower than UTSL's 6.35% return.


YINN

1D
3.08%
1M
-23.37%
YTD
-29.95%
6M
-32.53%
1Y
-27.68%
3Y*
-6.43%
5Y*
-38.50%
10Y*
-18.37%

UTSL

1D
3.20%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.90%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. UTSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-29.95%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%73.41%
UTSL
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares
6.35%29.03%54.24%-35.55%-14.06%48.16%-38.58%81.07%-2.27%11.00%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and UTSL is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2017

0.13

YINN vs. UTSL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YINN
UTSL

Financial Services

34.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

27.4%

-

Communication Services

15.7%

-

Energy

5.6%

-

Technology

5.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.4%

-

Healthcare

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.4%
100.0%

Financial Services

YINN
34.7%
UTSL

-

Consumer Cyclical

YINN
27.4%
UTSL

-

Communication Services

YINN
15.7%
UTSL

-

Energy

YINN
5.6%
UTSL

-

Technology

YINN
5.5%
UTSL

-

Basic Materials

YINN
4.2%
UTSL

-

Industrials

YINN
2.4%
UTSL

-

Healthcare

YINN
2.3%
UTSL

-

Real Estate

YINN
1.0%
UTSL

-

Consumer Defensive

YINN
0.9%
UTSL

-

Utilities

YINN
0.4%
UTSL
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YINN vs. UTSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

UTSL
UTSL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UTSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTSL Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UTSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTSL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. UTSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YINNUTSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.10

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

0.64

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

1.30

-2.39

YINN vs. UTSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the UTSL Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and UTSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YINN vs. UTSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than UTSL's maximum drawdown of -79.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and UTSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YINNUTSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.87%

-79.55%

-19.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.61%

-28.45%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.08%

-46.22%

-22.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-68.01%

-28.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.52%

-21.69%

-75.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.51%

-33.19%

-35.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.53%

13.87%

+11.66%

Volatility

YINN vs. UTSL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 18.63% compared to Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares (UTSL) at 17.03%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YINNUTSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.63%

17.03%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.54%

35.33%

+7.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.74%

43.73%

+15.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.19%

52.08%

+42.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.73%

59.23%

+22.50%

YINN vs. UTSL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than UTSL's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YINN vs. UTSL - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than UTSL's 1.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
UTSL
Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X Shares
1.71%1.69%1.61%3.61%1.15%1.19%1.40%5.01%1.46%0.57%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.42%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


YINN and UTSL have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YINN has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to UTSL (17.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs UTSL's -79.55%.

On 5-year performance, UTSL leads with 8.66% vs -38.50% for YINN. On fees, UTSL is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, UTSL has been the lower-risk option at 17.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UTSL has performed better with a 8.66% return vs -38.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UTSL is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

UTSL has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.42% for YINN.

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while UTSL tracks Utilities Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.99% for UTSL.

UTSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YINN and UTSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer