PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YINN vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YINN vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 115.57% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of -19.13%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 53.62% annualized return.


YINN

1D
-0.52%
1M
-10.06%
YTD
-28.25%
6M
-32.42%
1Y
-20.61%
3Y*
-2.89%
5Y*
-38.69%
10Y*
-19.13%

TECL

1D
-4.56%
1M
55.10%
YTD
115.57%
6M
106.65%
1Y
249.35%
3Y*
78.93%
5Y*
42.11%
10Y*
53.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YINN vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-28.25%54.21%36.06%-53.08%-71.97%-58.56%-7.75%28.92%-48.47%129.79%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
115.57%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and TECL is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2009

0.54

The correlation between YINN and TECL shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

YINN vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YINN
TECL

Financial Services

34.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

27.4%

-

Communication Services

15.7%

-

Energy

5.6%
0.0%

Technology

5.5%
20.4%

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.4%
0.0%

Healthcare

2.3%

-

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Utilities

0.4%

-

Financial Services

YINN
34.7%
TECL

-

Consumer Cyclical

YINN
27.4%
TECL

-

Communication Services

YINN
15.7%
TECL

-

Energy

YINN
5.6%
TECL
0.0%

Technology

YINN
5.5%
TECL
20.4%

Basic Materials

YINN
4.2%
TECL

-

Industrials

YINN
2.4%
TECL
0.0%

Healthcare

YINN
2.3%
TECL

-

Real Estate

YINN
1.0%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

YINN
0.9%
TECL

-

Utilities

YINN
0.4%
TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YINN vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YINNTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.46

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

5.39

-5.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

15.48

-16.32

YINN vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 4.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YINNTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

4.03

-4.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.57

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

0.74

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.76

-0.98

Drawdowns

YINN vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than TECL's maximum drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YINNTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.87%

-77.96%

-20.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.74%

-46.58%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.08%

-66.58%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.28%

-77.96%

-18.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

-77.96%

-20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.46%

-7.42%

-90.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.48%

-18.38%

-50.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.39%

16.19%

+8.20%

Volatility

YINN vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) have volatilities of 21.19% and 21.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YINNTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.19%

21.53%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.60%

50.05%

-7.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.73%

62.27%

-3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.19%

74.08%

+20.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.78%

72.35%

+9.43%

YINN vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

YINN vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than TECL's 3.30% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.30%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.39%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


YINN and TECL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (21.53%) compared to YINN (21.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 53.62% vs -19.13% for YINN. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, YINN has been the lower-risk option at 21.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 53.62% return vs -19.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 1.39% for YINN.

YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 0.91% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.03 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YINN and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer