YINN vs. ERX
YINN (Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - YINN tracks the FTSE China 50 Index (300%) while ERX tracks the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, YINN returned -18.37%/yr vs -9.35%/yr for ERX. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YINN charges 1.52%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
YINN vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -29.95% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 59.95% return. Over the past 10 years, YINN has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -18.37%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -9.35% annualized return.
YINN
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -23.37%
- YTD
- -29.95%
- 6M
- -32.53%
- 1Y
- -27.68%
- 3Y*
- -6.43%
- 5Y*
- -38.50%
- 10Y*
- -18.37%
ERX
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 59.95%
- 6M
- 56.17%
- 1Y
- 70.63%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 27.98%
- 10Y*
- -9.35%
YINN vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | -29.95% | 54.21% | 36.06% | -53.08% | -71.97% | -58.56% | -7.75% | 28.92% | -48.47% | 129.79% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 59.95% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 111.91% | -91.60% | 17.13% | -55.94% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between YINN and ERX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2009 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between YINN and ERX has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
YINN vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
YINN
ERX
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
YINN
ERX
-
Consumer Cyclical
YINN
ERX
-
Communication Services
YINN
ERX
-
Energy
YINN
ERX
Technology
YINN
ERX
-
Basic Materials
YINN
ERX
-
Industrials
YINN
ERX
-
Healthcare
YINN
ERX
-
Real Estate
YINN
ERX
-
Consumer Defensive
YINN
ERX
-
Utilities
YINN
ERX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YINN vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
YINN
ERX
YINN vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YINN | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.27 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.56 | 3.04 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 7.87 | -8.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YINN vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YINN | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.87% | -99.54% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.61% | -23.34% | -26.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.08% | -42.34% | -26.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.28% | -46.90% | -49.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.59% | -98.59% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.52% | -91.93% | -5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -68.51% | -67.06% | -1.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.53% | 9.00% | +16.53% |
Volatility
YINN vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) has a higher volatility of 18.63% compared to Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) at 14.44%. This indicates that YINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YINN | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.63% | 14.44% | +4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.54% | 33.89% | +8.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.74% | 41.24% | +17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.19% | 52.06% | +42.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.73% | 69.11% | +12.62% |
YINN vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
YINN vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than ERX's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.68% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
YINN Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares | 1.42% | 1.12% | 1.81% | 4.17% | 1.16% | 0.73% | 0.76% | 1.38% | 1.02% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YINN and ERX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YINN has higher volatility (18.63%) compared to ERX (14.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YINN dropped -98.87% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -9.35% vs -18.37% for YINN. On fees, ERX is cheaper at 1.09% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 14.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -9.35% return vs -18.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERX is cheaper with a 1.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for YINN.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.42% for YINN.
YINN tracks FTSE China 50 Index (300%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.52% for YINN and 1.09% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YINN and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer