PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YINN vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YINN vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YINN vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
-24.84%44.63%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
-16.65%96.98%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YINN achieves a -24.84% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's -16.65% return.


YINN

1D
-2.62%
1M
-12.56%
YTD
-24.84%
6M
-41.84%
1Y
-21.62%
3Y*
-10.54%
5Y*
-38.80%
10Y*
-18.56%

AMDG

1D
6.82%
1M
8.29%
YTD
-16.65%
6M
21.40%
1Y
149.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YINN vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

YINN has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YINN vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YINN
YINN Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
YINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YINN Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
YINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
YINN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YINN vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YINNAMDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

1.16

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.04

2.22

-2.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.29

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

2.65

-3.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.13

5.15

-6.27

YINN vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YINN Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YINN and AMDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YINNAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

1.16

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.42

-0.64

Correlation

The correlation between YINN and AMDG is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

YINN vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

YINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than AMDG's 13.44% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
YINN
Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares
1.33%1.12%1.81%4.17%1.16%0.73%0.76%1.38%1.02%1.11%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
13.44%11.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

YINN vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YINN drawdown since its inception was -98.87%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YINN and AMDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YINNAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.87%

-63.04%

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.61%

-56.48%

+9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.33%

-49.06%

-48.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.17%

-27.74%

-40.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.65%

29.05%

-9.40%

Volatility

YINN vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily China 3x Bull Shares (YINN) is 19.90%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 32.60%. This indicates that YINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YINNAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.90%

32.60%

-12.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.88%

98.81%

-54.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.63%

129.88%

-58.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.09%

124.87%

-30.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.89%

124.87%

-42.98%