PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YGOG.NEO (Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF) and HBF.TO (Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, YGOG.NEO returned 45.35%/yr vs 14.19%/yr for HBF.TO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YGOG.NEO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HBF.TO.

Performance

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) and Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YGOG.NEO achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly higher than HBF.TO's 8.15% return.

YGOG.NEO

1D
-0.97%
1M
-7.79%
YTD
10.76%
6M
8.82%
1Y
119.67%
3Y*
45.35%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

HBF.TO

1D
-1.15%
1M
3.49%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.25%
1Y
25.20%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
YGOG.NEO
Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF		10.76%69.45%46.37%56.07%1.18%
HBF.TO
Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)		8.15%15.51%13.12%11.23%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between YGOG.NEO and HBF.TO is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2022

0.47

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
YGOG.NEO
HBF.TO

Communication Services

100.0%
10.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

15.1%

Energy

-

5.1%

Financial Services

-

19.7%

Healthcare

-

5.0%

Industrials

-

5.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

29.5%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

YGOG.NEO
100.0%
HBF.TO
10.4%

Basic Materials

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
15.1%

Energy

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
5.1%

Financial Services

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
19.7%

Healthcare

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
5.0%

Industrials

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
5.4%

Real Estate

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO

-

Technology

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO
29.5%

Utilities

YGOG.NEO

-

HBF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF

Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)

Often compared with YGOG.NEO:
YGOG.NEO vs. CBNK.TOYGOG.NEO vs. MSHE.TOYGOG.NEO vs. HLIF.TOYGOG.NEO vs. GOGY.TOYGOG.NEO vs. UMAX.TOYGOG.NEO vs. TEC.TOYGOG.NEO vs. ENCC.TO
Often compared with HBF.TO:
HBF.TO vs. XTOT.TOHBF.TO vs. RUD.TOHBF.TO vs. HPYE.TOHBF.TO vs. HPYB.TOHBF.TO vs. METE.TOHBF.TO vs. FLUS.TOHBF.TO vs. CNQE.TO

Return for Risk

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
YGOG.NEO
YGOG.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
YGOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGOG.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGOG.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
YGOG.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGOG.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
HBF.TO
HBF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) and Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

YGOG.NEOHBF.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.77

2.46

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.77

3.52

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.44

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.52

3.25

+2.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.61

13.35

+7.26

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YGOG.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 3.77, which is higher than the HBF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YGOG.NEO and HBF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

YGOG.NEOHBF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77

2.46

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.55

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.62

0.50

+1.12

Drawdowns

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YGOG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -33.45%, smaller than the maximum HBF.TO drawdown of -35.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGOG.NEO and HBF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

YGOG.NEOHBF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.45%

-35.28%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.82%

-7.79%

-14.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.45%

-15.21%

-18.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-23.69%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-35.28%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.86%

-1.15%

-10.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-6.77%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.83%

1.89%

+3.94%

Volatility

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF (YGOG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged) (HBF.TO) at 2.65%. This indicates that YGOG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HBF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

YGOG.NEOHBF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.10%

2.65%

+8.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.75%

7.79%

+14.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.02%

10.29%

+21.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.94%

14.07%

+18.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.94%

16.95%

+15.99%

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

YGOG.NEO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HBF.TO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

YGOG.NEO vs. HBF.TO - Dividend Comparison

YGOG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.15%, more than HBF.TO's 7.41% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBF.TO
Harvest US Equity Leaders Income ETF Class A (CAD Hedged)		7.41%7.27%7.48%7.52%7.75%5.62%6.34%6.57%7.72%6.86%7.54%7.74%
YGOG.NEO
Alphabet (GOOGL) Yield Shares Purpose ETF		8.15%5.84%14.19%7.22%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

YGOG.NEO and HBF.TO have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, YGOG.NEO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

YGOG.NEO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HBF.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Purpose and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for YGOG.NEO and 0.75% for HBF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YGOG.NEO and HBF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer