PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YGLD vs. DZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YGLD vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YGLD achieves a -19.95% return, which is significantly higher than DZZ's -50.53% return.


YGLD

1D
-1.08%
1M
-4.15%
6M
-31.33%
YTD
-19.95%
1Y
8.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.17%

DZZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
-7.58%
6M
-52.15%
YTD
-50.53%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
-9.06%
5Y*
-6.95%
10Y*
-9.09%
ALL TIME*
-13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.88K$5.95K$21.77K
$343.14K$346.41K$504.18K

YGLD vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YGLD
Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF
-19.95%96.82%-4.26%
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes
-50.53%132.78%-4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between YGLD and DZZ is -0.40, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024

-0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YGLD vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YGLD
YGLD Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
YGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
YGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
YGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
YGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

DZZ
DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YGLD vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YGLDDZZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

0.02

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

0.03

+0.50

YGLD vs. DZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YGLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the DZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YGLD and DZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YGLD vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YGLD drawdown since its inception was -43.35%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YGLD and DZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YGLDDZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.35%

-96.64%

+53.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.35%

-81.05%

+37.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.24%

-95.37%

+53.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-82.40%

+71.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.81%

61.82%

-40.01%

Volatility

YGLD vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Gold Strategy PLUS Income ETF (YGLD) is 9.12%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that YGLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YGLDDZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.12%

14.44%

-5.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.73%

52.18%

-17.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.37%

170.05%

-127.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.04%

84.19%

-45.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.04%

64.26%

-25.22%

YGLD vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

YGLD has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

YGLD vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

YGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.88%, while DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


YGLD and DZZ have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DZZ has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to YGLD (9.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YGLD dropped -43.35% vs DZZ's -96.64%.

On 1-year performance, YGLD leads with 8.94% vs 6.12% for DZZ. On fees, YGLD is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, YGLD has been the lower-risk option at 9.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, YGLD has performed better with a 8.94% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

YGLD is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for DZZ.

YGLD has the higher dividend yield at 22.88%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.

YGLD is categorized as Gold, while DZZ is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for YGLD and 0.75% for DZZ.

YGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YGLD and DZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer