PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GLCR vs. XXRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GLCR vs. XXRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) and Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GLCR achieves a -10.49% return, which is significantly higher than XXRP's -69.63% return.


GLCR

1D
-0.67%
1M
-9.07%
YTD
-10.49%
6M
-3.88%
1Y
-7.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XXRP

1D
-2.69%
1M
-28.47%
YTD
-69.63%
6M
-79.63%
1Y
-90.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GLCR vs. XXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GLCR
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF
-10.49%25.66%
XXRP
Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF
-69.63%-56.74%

Correlation

The correlation between GLCR and XXRP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GLCR vs. XXRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GLCR
GLCR Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
GLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XXRP
XXRP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
XXRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XXRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
XXRP Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
XXRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
XXRP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GLCR vs. XXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) and Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GLCRXXRPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.87

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.44

-0.95

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-1.26

+0.05

GLCR vs. XXRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GLCR Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is comparable to the XXRP Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GLCR and XXRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GLCRXXRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

-0.60

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.15

-0.57

+0.42

Drawdowns

GLCR vs. XXRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GLCR drawdown since its inception was -16.79%, smaller than the maximum XXRP drawdown of -95.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GLCR and XXRP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GLCRXXRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.79%

-95.20%

+78.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.79%

-95.20%

+78.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.79%

-95.20%

+78.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-59.63%

+55.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.02%

71.22%

-65.20%

Volatility

GLCR vs. XXRP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF (GLCR) is 7.93%, while Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF (XXRP) has a volatility of 27.69%. This indicates that GLCR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GLCRXXRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.93%

27.69%

-19.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.27%

105.84%

-92.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.40%

149.92%

-133.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

146.13%

-127.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.62%

146.13%

-127.51%

GLCR vs. XXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GLCR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than XXRP's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GLCR vs. XXRP - Dividend Comparison

GLCR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than XXRP's 21.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GLCR
GlacierShares Nasdaq Iceland ETF
1.08%0.97%
XXRP
Teucrium 2x Long Daily XRP ETF
21.50%6.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


GLCR and XXRP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XXRP has higher volatility (27.69%) compared to GLCR (7.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GLCR dropped -16.79% vs XXRP's -95.20%.

On 1-year performance, GLCR leads with -7.32% vs -90.09% for XXRP. On fees, GLCR is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GLCR has been the lower-risk option at 7.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GLCR has performed better with a -7.32% return vs -90.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLCR is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.89% for XXRP.

XXRP has the higher dividend yield at 21.50%, compared with 1.08% for GLCR.

GLCR is categorized as Europe Equities, while XXRP is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GLCR and 1.89% for XXRP.

GLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.45 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GLCR and XXRP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer